Humble Pie: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;">Problems With Prophecies</div> | <div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;">Problems With Prophecies</div> | ||
{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;" | {|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;" | ||
|''Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail'' ~ I Corinthians 13:8a | |''Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail.'' ~ I Corinthians 13:8a | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
The following list contains the articles on Believethesign of prophecies made by William Branham. Beside the prophecy is a short summary of an issue that calls into question the validity of the prophecy. Some of these prophecies may still come to pass, while others cannot because they are in the past. The sad situation is it appears that William Branham was “hit some, miss some” with his prophecies. | The following list contains the articles on Believethesign of prophecies made by William Branham. Beside the prophecy is a short summary of an issue that calls into question the validity of the prophecy. Some of these prophecies may still come to pass, while others cannot because they are in the past. The sad situation is it appears that William Branham was “hit some, miss some” with his prophecies. | ||
Click on headings if you want to read detailed commentary on a particular issue. | '''Click on headings''' if you want to read detailed commentary on a particular issue. | ||
'''[[The Municipal Bridge Vision|Municipal Bridge]]''' | '''[[The Municipal Bridge Vision|Municipal Bridge]]''' | ||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
'''[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]''' | '''[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]''' | ||
:Part of William Branham’s 1933 prophecy was that FDR would pick on the Germans, lead the world to war, and run for four terms. While Roosevelt was inaugurated four times, he did not pick on the Germans and followed the world to war after provocation by the Japanese. William Branham called Franklin D. Roosevelt a “rascal” in 1960, which indicates that he just did not like him. | :Part of William Branham’s 1933 prophecy was that FDR would pick on the Germans, lead the world to war, and run for four terms. While Roosevelt was inaugurated four times, he did not pick on the Germans and followed the world to war after provocation by the Japanese. William Branham called Franklin D. Roosevelt a “rascal” in 1960, which indicates that he just did not like him. | ||
'''[[1933 Ohio River Experience|The Voice on the Ohio River in 1933]] | |||
:Many followers of William Branham's message point to the voice that was heard on the Ohio River as proof that William Branham was to forerun the second coming of Christ just as John the Baptist foreran Christ's first coming. However, when closely examined there are a number of problems with this story, including the fact that the first accounts make no reference of a voice. After a great deal of research, we are now of the view that William Branham's story of the baptismal service changed over time to include a voice when, in fact, no one that was there actually heard it. | |||
'''[[Heavenly Vision]]''' | '''[[Heavenly Vision]]''' | ||
Line 187: | Line 190: | ||
:This prophecy appears to be an interpretation of the wording in the book of Revelation, as opposed to a formal prophecy. | :This prophecy appears to be an interpretation of the wording in the book of Revelation, as opposed to a formal prophecy. | ||
If William Branham was not accurate with even one of his prophecies, then this calls into question his authority as an infallible prophet. | If William Branham was not accurate with even one of his prophecies, then this calls into question his authority as an infallible prophet. While some of these prophecies may still come to pass, other have definitely missed the mark. In the end his prophetic scorecard appears to be “you hit some, you miss some”, and not something you can trust. | ||
{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;" | {|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;" | ||
Line 201: | Line 204: | ||
|} | |} | ||
There are a number of William Branham’s doctrines on Believethesign.com that can be supported from the Bible. However, opposing views | There are a number of William Branham’s doctrines on Believethesign.com that can be supported from the Bible. However, opposing views may be capable of being supported from the Bible as well, and may even constitute the better view. | ||
Additionally, a number of William Branham's significant teachings appear to have been borrowed in large part from other men. The details of our finding on this issue can be found in our article on [[Plagiarism]]. | |||
The primary purpose of this website is to provide a balanced, unbiased information on the ministry of William Branham. We therefore have a number of articles that discuss his doctrinal teachings. We have not removed them, but over time will be augmenting them with comments relating to how they relate to a more orthodox position. Some of these teachings include: | |||
'''[[Healing lines]]''' | '''[[Healing lines|Healing]]''' | ||
:Jesus died for your salvation, and suffered for your healing. Accepting his sacrifice results in spiritual and physical blessings that are confirmed by scriptures. | :Jesus died for your salvation, and suffered for your healing. Accepting his sacrifice results in spiritual and physical blessings that are confirmed by scriptures. | ||
Line 210: | Line 217: | ||
'''[[The Godhead]]''' | '''[[The Godhead]]''' | ||
:The problem with William Branham’s teaching on the Godhead is that you can find quotes of William Branham clearly teaching both the Trinity or Oneness doctrines, and then denouncing both doctrines as false. The article on the Godhead that you will find on this site outlines a doctrine based on William Branham’s “body/spirit/soul” teachings, and is a bridge between traditional Trinitiarian and Onesness beliefs – which is | :The problem with William Branham’s teaching on the Godhead is that you can find quotes of William Branham clearly teaching both the Trinity or Oneness doctrines, and then denouncing both doctrines as false. The article on the Godhead that you will find on this site outlines a doctrine based on William Branham’s “body/spirit/soul” teachings, and is a bridge between traditional Trinitiarian and Onesness beliefs – which is how William Braham described his doctrine. Historically, this teaching is closest (but not identical) to Swedenborg’s explanation of the Godhead that John Wesley ridiculed. | ||
'''[[The Serpent's Seed]]''' | '''[[The Serpent's Seed]]''' | ||
:William Branham taught that Cain and Abel were twins, yet Adam was the father of Abel and the Serpent was the father of Cain. While this doctrine can be | :William Branham taught that Cain and Abel were twins, yet Adam was the father of Abel and the Serpent was the father of Cain. While there appears to be some support in the scriptures for this doctrine, there are also a number of passages in the Bible that can be used to refute it. Additionally, it is not salvational, i.e. accepting or rejecting this doctrine does not impact one's salvation. However, even if one could trace their lineage back to Cain, Jesus still died for their sins. | ||
'''[[Angel|Angels]]''' | '''[[Angel|Angels]]''' | ||
Line 222: | Line 226: | ||
'''[[Seven Church Ages]], [[Seven Seals]], [[Mystery Babylon]]''' | '''[[Seven Church Ages]], [[Seven Seals]], [[Mystery Babylon]]''' | ||
:These articles each present an interpretation of scripture as preached by William Branham in the 1960's. | :These articles each present an interpretation of scripture as preached by William Branham in the 1960's. While William Branham indicated that these doctrines were taught to him by an angel, ti appears that much of it [[Plagiarism|comes directly from Clarence Larkin’s published dispensational teachings]]. | ||
:Studying the church ages is a great way to learn Church history. Some items you may learn while studying the Church Ages as taught by William Branham are: | :Studying the church ages is a great way to learn Church history. Some items you may learn while studying the Church Ages as taught by William Branham are: | ||
Line 230: | Line 234: | ||
:*Charles Taze Russell (the founder of the Jeohvah Witnesses) was the first person to assign names to the Church Age Messengers (including himself as the Laodicean Messenger). | :*Charles Taze Russell (the founder of the Jeohvah Witnesses) was the first person to assign names to the Church Age Messengers (including himself as the Laodicean Messenger). | ||
If you are curious as to a sample of William Branham’s doctrines that we feel cannot be supported by scripture (we hope to have articles on these issues in the future), they include but are not limited to: | |||
If you are curious as to a sample of William Branham’s doctrines that we feel cannot be supported by scripture ( | |||
*God only deals with one prophet at a time, | *God only deals with one prophet at a time, | ||
*Noah started building the ark after he saw Enoch go in a Rapture, | *Noah started building the ark after he saw Enoch go in a Rapture, | ||
Line 244: | Line 246: | ||
<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;">Prophecy of | <div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;">The Prophecy of William Branham's Death</div> | ||
{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;" | {|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;" | ||
|''And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.'' ~ Hebrews 12:27 | |''And this word, Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.'' ~ Hebrews 12:27 | ||
Line 250: | Line 252: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Sometime in 1964 or 1965, a prophecy was communicated to William Branham that he would pass off the scene before the end of 1965 because of an error he would make. We have researched [[Hagin Prophecy|this prophecy as detailed by Kenneth Hagin and Gordon Lindsay’s wife, Freda Lindsay]], and found that, according to Biblical principles, '''Kenneth Hagin accurately prophesied William Branham's death in January 1964'''. This should cause significant concern to anyone following William Branham's message. | |||
{|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;" | {|style="width:800px; background-color:#cedff2; border:1px #a3b0bf solid; text-align:center;" | ||
Line 302: | Line 302: | ||
Jeremy Bergen, Editor | Jeremy Bergen, Editor | ||
Rod Bergen, Webmaster | |||
www.believethesign.com | www.believethesign.com |
Revision as of 01:21, 16 February 2013
This article is a formal apology for publishing and distributing false doctrine.
Dear Reader, From the start, the purpose of Believethesign.com has been to provide evidence to support truth. Having grown up in a Message Church, the truth being supported was naturally that William Branham was Elijah the Prophet in fulfillment of Malachi 4:5 and Revelation 10:7. In the fall of 2011, we changed the main scripture reference of the website to “Jesus Christ the same yesterday and today and forever” (Hebrews 13:8) in order shift the focus of the site clearly onto Jesus Christ. The driving force behind this change is that we have uncovered a number of significant issues with the evidence supporting William Branham’s prophetic ministry, as he proclaimed it. At the same time, we have not found any significant issues with the evidence supporting the healings and word of knowledge that brought attention to William Branham’s ministry. In 1963, William Branham said:
What you now read on Believethesign.com should be an accurate historic account of William Branham’s life. By bringing to light supportable evidence, we hope that you find yourself in a better position to separate any pits from the pie. However, there is another analogy that concerns us even more. In 1965 William Branham said:
While our responsibility is simply to present the truth in love, our concern is that fifty years later, the beauty of William Branham’s ministry has been consumed by impurities that were always present in his ministry. Some of these items are described in the pages that are linked from this page (just click on the colored headings to go to the detail pages). Why it took so long for these things to surface is not clear. If you find that the evidence on this site has misled you in the past, we apologize. Thankfully, humble pie is always fresh.
Good Articles
From our perspective, the information in the following links continues to provide good evidence that the healing and word of knowledge ministries of William Branham were genuine: The following books are also good information on the healings and miracles that followed William Branham’s ministry:
The various prayers linked to the healing lines article are also accurate historic accounts. These provide evidence to the accuracy of the word of knowledge. Based on the confirmation of the testimonies above, we do not have any reason to doubt that God honored these prayers with real healing. As you can read for yourself if you look at these articles, you will find that these people were healed by believing on the name and sacrifice of Jesus Christ.
Problems With Prophecies
The following list contains the articles on Believethesign of prophecies made by William Branham. Beside the prophecy is a short summary of an issue that calls into question the validity of the prophecy. Some of these prophecies may still come to pass, while others cannot because they are in the past. The sad situation is it appears that William Branham was “hit some, miss some” with his prophecies. Click on headings if you want to read detailed commentary on a particular issue.
The Voice on the Ohio River in 1933
Hitler and WWII William Branham mentions that this vision was “Thus Saith the Lord”, and that he wrote it down in 1933. This creates a problem as he identifies the Maginot Line, and says the vision occurred 11 years before it was fulfilled.
If William Branham was not accurate with even one of his prophecies, then this calls into question his authority as an infallible prophet. While some of these prophecies may still come to pass, other have definitely missed the mark. In the end his prophetic scorecard appears to be “you hit some, you miss some”, and not something you can trust.
Doctrines
There are a number of William Branham’s doctrines on Believethesign.com that can be supported from the Bible. However, opposing views may be capable of being supported from the Bible as well, and may even constitute the better view. Additionally, a number of William Branham's significant teachings appear to have been borrowed in large part from other men. The details of our finding on this issue can be found in our article on Plagiarism. The primary purpose of this website is to provide a balanced, unbiased information on the ministry of William Branham. We therefore have a number of articles that discuss his doctrinal teachings. We have not removed them, but over time will be augmenting them with comments relating to how they relate to a more orthodox position. Some of these teachings include:
Seven Church Ages, Seven Seals, Mystery Babylon
If you are curious as to a sample of William Branham’s doctrines that we feel cannot be supported by scripture (we hope to have articles on these issues in the future), they include but are not limited to:
The Prophecy of William Branham's Death
Sometime in 1964 or 1965, a prophecy was communicated to William Branham that he would pass off the scene before the end of 1965 because of an error he would make. We have researched this prophecy as detailed by Kenneth Hagin and Gordon Lindsay’s wife, Freda Lindsay, and found that, according to Biblical principles, Kenneth Hagin accurately prophesied William Branham's death in January 1964. This should cause significant concern to anyone following William Branham's message.
Where do we stand now?
Here are some simple questions and answers that will outline the perspective of the editors of www.believethesign.com:
William Branham seemed to really, really want to be an Old Testament-style prophet. Sadly, the Old Testament prophets were not able to live up to the law that they were under. Solomon had the gift of wisdom, but ended up worshipping false gods. Samson had the gift of strength, but ended up powerless to temptation. Even Moses and David had faults that got them in trouble with God. To become an Old Testament prophet, William Branham had to start teaching the law. He began focusing on outward conformation to the “rules” in the Bible (tithing, hair, divorce), and eventually left the weightier matters. Some followers of William Branham even preach a "Third Testament" doctrine, which replaces grace with revelation. A month before his passing, William Branham was teaching that Elijah was Jesus Christ. He had defined God into the box of his own life, and appears to have started exalting himself over the church of God.
The sad part is that these people are all Christians who have simply forgotten the power of faith in Jesus’ atonement, and replaced it with faith in a gifted man. William Branham said that every man will get caught by money, power or women. For him, what originated as a gift of healing became a display of power over diseases, which seems to have ultimately led to a desire for dominion over the church through his “my way or the highway” preaching. So, William Branham’s life may more closely parallel Solomon’s life, or Samson’s life, than Elijah’s life. The main question is where do we go from here? The answer is back to the grace of the New Testament covenant. Sound strange? If so, it’s because we as message believers haven’t realized (or forgot) that it was Jesus’ blood, and not William Branham’s doctrine, that has kept us clean before God. Even though we really know that in our hearts, we haven’t let it permeate our being like the scriptures teach. So, this letter is an encouragement to get back to our first love, Jesus Christ, and the Good News of his grace. May the Lord Jesus Christ lead you in his light, Jeremy Bergen, Editor Rod Bergen, Webmaster www.believethesign.com
|