Humble Pie: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Was William Branham honest? If he can be shown to have distorted the truth or if his stories are constantly changing over time such that he cannot be believed, this would cast doubt on virtually everything that he said. The following list contains issues that will raise questions regarding his honesty, integrity and truthfulness. Some of these concerns have only recently come to light but they are | Was William Branham honest? If he can be shown to have distorted the truth or if his stories are constantly changing over time such that he cannot be believed, this would cast doubt on virtually everything that he said. The following list contains issues that will raise questions regarding his honesty, integrity and truthfulness. Some of these concerns have only recently come to light but they are now sufficient in number to raise genuine concern on the part of anyone who is a follower of William Branham. | ||
When you read these concerns, please ask yourself this fundamental question - '''Why?''' | When you read these concerns, please ask yourself this fundamental question - '''Why?''' | ||
Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
'''[[The Godhead]]''' | '''[[The Godhead]]''' | ||
:The problem with William Branham’s teaching on the Godhead is that you can find quotes of William Branham clearly teaching both the Trinity or Oneness doctrines, and then denouncing both doctrines as false. The article on the Godhead that you will find on this site outlines a doctrine based on William Branham’s “body/spirit/soul” teachings, and is a bridge between traditional Trinitiarian and | :The problem with William Branham’s teaching on the Godhead is that you can find quotes of William Branham clearly teaching both the Trinity or Oneness doctrines, and then denouncing both doctrines as false. The article on the Godhead that you will find on this site outlines a doctrine based on William Branham’s “body/spirit/soul” teachings, and is a bridge between traditional Trinitiarian and Oneness beliefs – which is how William Braham described his doctrine. Historically, this teaching is closest (but not identical) to Swedenborg’s explanation of the Godhead that John Wesley ridiculed. | ||
'''[[The Serpent's Seed]]''' | '''[[The Serpent's Seed]]''' | ||
Line 203: | Line 203: | ||
:*How the white horse rider has moved throughout Church history, which will help you identify how it is moving in message churches today. | :*How the white horse rider has moved throughout Church history, which will help you identify how it is moving in message churches today. | ||
:*The dates of the church ages are copied from Clarence Larkin's books. | :*The dates of the church ages are copied from Clarence Larkin's books. | ||
:*Charles Taze Russell (the founder of the | :*Charles Taze Russell (the founder of the Jehovah Witnesses) was the first person to assign names to the Church Age Messengers (including himself as the Laodicean Messenger). | ||
If you are curious as to a sample of William Branham’s doctrines that we feel cannot be supported by scripture (we hope to have articles on these issues in the future), they include but are not limited to: | If you are curious as to a sample of William Branham’s doctrines that we feel cannot be supported by scripture (we hope to have articles on these issues in the future), they include but are not limited to: | ||
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
<div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;">Good Articles</div> | <div style="border-bottom:1px #B87333 solid; text-align:center; font-size:140%; padding:1px; margin:1px;">Good Articles</div> | ||
{| style="width:800px; border:1px solid #E8B399;background-color:#F0DCC8;vertical-align:top; text-align:center;" | {| style="width:800px; border:1px solid #E8B399;background-color:#F0DCC8;vertical-align:top; text-align:center;" | ||
|''…approve things that are excellent; that ye may be sincere and without | |''…approve things that are excellent; that ye may be sincere and without offense till the day of Christ.'' ~ Philippians 1:10 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 329: | Line 329: | ||
{{col-end}} | {{col-end}} | ||
William Branham seemed to really, really want to be an Old Testament-style prophet. Sadly, the Old Testament prophets were not able to live up to the law that they were under. Solomon had the gift of wisdom, but ended up | William Branham seemed to really, really want to be an Old Testament-style prophet. Sadly, the Old Testament prophets were not able to live up to the law that they were under. Solomon had the gift of wisdom, but ended up worshiping false gods. Samson had the gift of strength, but ended up powerless to temptation. Even Moses and David had faults that got them in trouble with God. | ||
To become an Old Testament prophet, William Branham had to start teaching the law. He began focusing on outward conformation to the “rules” in the Bible (tithing, hair, divorce), and eventually left the weightier matters. [[Image:CrossOK.jpg|right|thumb|250px| Let's be simple | To become an Old Testament prophet, William Branham had to start teaching the law. He began focusing on outward conformation to the “rules” in the Bible (tithing, hair, divorce), and eventually left the weightier matters. [[Image:CrossOK.jpg|right|thumb|250px| Let's be simple Christians who believe in Jesus - his death, his resurrection, and his power. A "mighty revelation" won't do us any good if we don't have the love of Jesus Christ, and love for others.]] Some followers of William Branham even preach a "Third Testament" doctrine, which replaces grace with revelation. A month before his passing, William Branham was teaching that Elijah was Jesus Christ. He had defined God into the box of his own life, and appears to have started exalting himself over the church of God. | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 22 February 2013
This article is a formal apology for publishing and distributing false doctrine.
Dear Reader, From the start, the purpose of Believethesign.com has been to provide evidence to support truth. Having grown up in a Message Church, the truth being supported was naturally that William Branham was Elijah the Prophet in fulfillment of Malachi 4:5 and Revelation 10:7. In the fall of 2011, we changed the main scripture reference of the website to “Jesus Christ the same yesterday and today and forever” (Hebrews 13:8) in order shift the focus of the site clearly onto Jesus Christ. The driving force behind this change is that we have uncovered a number of significant issues with the evidence supporting William Branham’s prophetic ministry, as he proclaimed it. At the same time, we have not found any significant issues with the evidence supporting the healings and word of knowledge that brought attention to William Branham’s ministry. In 1963, William Branham said:
What you now read on Believethesign.com should be an accurate historic account of William Branham’s life. By bringing to light supportable evidence, we hope that you find yourself in a better position to separate any pits from the pie. However, there is another analogy that concerns us even more. In 1965 William Branham said:
While our responsibility is simply to present the truth in love, our concern is that fifty years later, the beauty of William Branham’s ministry has been consumed by impurities that were always present in his ministry. Some of these items are described in the pages that are linked from this page (just click on the colored headings to go to the detail pages). Why it took so long for these things to surface is not clear. You should be aware that, if you are a message believer, what follows may create something in you that is referred to as Cognitive Dissonance. That is only natural but please be aware that you may experience "disequilibrium" when you read this article: frustration, nausea, dread, guilt, anger, embarrassment, anxiety, or other similar symptoms. If you find that the evidence on this site has misled you in the past, we apologize. Thankfully, humble pie is always fresh.
Problems With Prophecies
The following list contains the articles on Believethesign of prophecies made by William Branham. Beside the prophecy is a short summary of an issue that calls into question the validity of the prophecy. Some of these prophecies may still come to pass, while others cannot because they are in the past. The sad situation is it appears that William Branham was “hit some, miss some” with his prophecies. Click on headings if you want to read detailed commentary on a particular issue.
The Voice on the Ohio River in 1933
If William Branham was not accurate with even one of his prophecies, then this calls into question his authority as an infallible prophet. While some of these prophecies may still come to pass, other have definitely missed the mark. In the end his prophetic scorecard appears to be “you hit some, you miss some”, and not something you can trust.
General Credibility
Was William Branham honest? If he can be shown to have distorted the truth or if his stories are constantly changing over time such that he cannot be believed, this would cast doubt on virtually everything that he said. The following list contains issues that will raise questions regarding his honesty, integrity and truthfulness. Some of these concerns have only recently come to light but they are now sufficient in number to raise genuine concern on the part of anyone who is a follower of William Branham. When you read these concerns, please ask yourself this fundamental question - Why? Click on headings if you want to read detailed commentary on a particular issue.
The Explanation for His Poor Grammar
Doctrines
There are a number of William Branham’s doctrines on Believethesign.com that can be supported from the Bible. However, opposing views may be capable of being supported from the Bible as well, and may even constitute the better view. Additionally, a number of William Branham's significant teachings appear to have been borrowed in large part from other men. The details of our finding on this issue can be found in our article on Plagiarism. The primary purpose of this website is to provide a balanced, unbiased information on the ministry of William Branham. We therefore have a number of articles that discuss his doctrinal teachings. We have not removed them, but over time will be augmenting them with comments relating to how they relate to a more orthodox position. Some of these teachings include:
Seven Church Ages, Seven Seals, Mystery Babylon
If you are curious as to a sample of William Branham’s doctrines that we feel cannot be supported by scripture (we hope to have articles on these issues in the future), they include but are not limited to:
The Prophecy of William Branham's Death
Sometime in 1964 or 1965, a prophecy was communicated to William Branham that he would pass off the scene before the end of 1965 because of an error he would make. We have researched this prophecy as detailed by Kenneth Hagin and Gordon Lindsay’s wife, Freda Lindsay, and found that, according to Biblical principles, Kenneth Hagin accurately prophesied William Branham's death in January 1964. This should cause significant concern to anyone following William Branham's message.
Good Articles
From our perspective, the information in the following links continues to provide good evidence that the healing and word of knowledge ministries of William Branham were genuine: The following books are also good information on the healings and miracles that followed William Branham’s ministry:
The various prayers linked to the healing lines article are also accurate historic accounts. These provide evidence to the accuracy of the word of knowledge. Based on the confirmation of the testimonies above, we do not have any reason to doubt that God honored these prayers with real healing. As you can read for yourself if you look at these articles, you will find that these people were healed by believing on the name and sacrifice of Jesus Christ.
Where do we stand now?
Here are some simple questions and answers that will outline the perspective of the editors of www.believethesign.com:
William Branham seemed to really, really want to be an Old Testament-style prophet. Sadly, the Old Testament prophets were not able to live up to the law that they were under. Solomon had the gift of wisdom, but ended up worshiping false gods. Samson had the gift of strength, but ended up powerless to temptation. Even Moses and David had faults that got them in trouble with God. To become an Old Testament prophet, William Branham had to start teaching the law. He began focusing on outward conformation to the “rules” in the Bible (tithing, hair, divorce), and eventually left the weightier matters. Some followers of William Branham even preach a "Third Testament" doctrine, which replaces grace with revelation. A month before his passing, William Branham was teaching that Elijah was Jesus Christ. He had defined God into the box of his own life, and appears to have started exalting himself over the church of God.
The sad part is that these people are all Christians who have simply forgotten the power of faith in Jesus’ atonement, and replaced it with faith in a gifted man. William Branham said that every man will get caught by money, power or women. For him, what originated as a gift of healing became a display of power over diseases, which seems to have ultimately led to a desire for dominion over the church through his “my way or the highway” preaching. So, William Branham’s life may more closely parallel Solomon’s life, or Samson’s life, than Elijah’s life. The main question is where do we go from here? The answer is back to the grace of the New Testament covenant. Sound strange? If so, it’s because we as message believers haven’t realized (or forgot) that it was Jesus’ blood, and not William Branham’s doctrine, that has kept us clean before God. Even though we really know that in our hearts, we haven’t let it permeate our being like the scriptures teach. So, this letter is an encouragement to get back to our first love, Jesus Christ, and the Good News of his grace. May the Lord Jesus Christ lead you in his light, Jeremy Bergen, Editor
|