Plagiarism: Difference between revisions

 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
'''Plagiarism''' is the act of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own. It is all about not telling people where you got your ideas from, particularly if you copy someone word for word.  It is not necessarily about copyright violation although that could be part of it.
'''Plagiarism''' is the act of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own. It is all about not telling people where you got your ideas from, particularly if you copy someone word for word.  It is not necessarily about copyright violation although that could be part of it.


Some Message followers try to argue that William Branham was not plagiarizing because he also used some of his own ideas.  However, according to the "Harvard Guide to Using Sources," even if you "write down your own ideas in your own words and place them around text that you've drawn directly from an uncited source, you are guilty of verbatim plagiarism. If you copy bits and pieces from a source (or several sources), changing a few words here and there without either adequately paraphrasing or quoting directly, the result is mosaic plagiarism.<ref>https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0</ref>   
Some Message followers try to argue that William Branham was not plagiarizing because he also used some of his own ideas.  However, according to the "Harvard Guide to Using Sources," even if you "write down your own ideas in your own words and place them around text that you've drawn directly from an uncited source," you are guilty of verbatim plagiarism. If you copy bits and pieces from a source (or several sources), changing a few words here and there without either adequately paraphrasing or quoting directly, the result is mosaic plagiarism.<ref>https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what-constitutes-plagiarism-0</ref>   


William Branham told his audience in his sermon on the Seventy Weeks of Daniel (see below) that he “didn’t know it yet” (but was going to preach on it that morning), that he’d studied Larkin’s writings BUT DIDN’T AGREE WITH THEM and that what they were going to hear was going to come from a revelation that William Branham was trusting GOD to give him. This is how William Branham lifted himself up to become the “messenger of God” of our age.
William Branham told his audience in his sermon on the Seventy Weeks of Daniel (see below) that he “didn’t know it yet” (but was going to preach on it that morning), that he’d studied Larkin’s writings BUT DIDN’T AGREE WITH THEM and that what they were going to hear was going to come from a revelation that William Branham was trusting GOD to give him. This is how William Branham lifted himself up to become the “messenger of God” of our age.
Line 67: Line 67:
If William Branham has simply said "I read this information in Clarence Larkin's book", then he would not have been guilty of plagiarism.  But he didn't.  Instead he said that he received it by divine revelation.  He said that God gave it to him, which was a lie.  He got the information directly from Clarence Larkin and others.  Below are '''specific examples of plagiarism in William Branham's ministry'''.  We have also addressed a few questions about plagiarism in the Bible which can be found by [[Q&A:Plagiarism|clicking here]].
If William Branham has simply said "I read this information in Clarence Larkin's book", then he would not have been guilty of plagiarism.  But he didn't.  Instead he said that he received it by divine revelation.  He said that God gave it to him, which was a lie.  He got the information directly from Clarence Larkin and others.  Below are '''specific examples of plagiarism in William Branham's ministry'''.  We have also addressed a few questions about plagiarism in the Bible which can be found by [[Q&A:Plagiarism|clicking here]].


=Examples of William Branham's plagiarism=
= Plagiarizing Clarence Larkin=
 
Compare the words of William Branham to the following people:
 
==Clarence Larkin==
[[Image:Clarence.jpg|thumb|right|Clarence Larkin]]
[[Image:Clarence.jpg|thumb|right|Clarence Larkin]]
[[Clarence Larkin]] (1850-1924) was American Baptist pastor, Bible teacher and author whose writings on Dispensationalism had a great impact on modern dispensational thinking.  While William Branham only mentions Clarence Larkin three times in all his recorded sermons, he drew heavily from him but never gave Larkin the credit for these teachings.
[[Clarence Larkin]] (1850-1924) was American Baptist pastor, Bible teacher and author whose writings on Dispensationalism had a great impact on modern dispensational thinking.  While William Branham only mentions Clarence Larkin three times in all his recorded sermons, he drew heavily from him but never gave Larkin the credit for these teachings.
Line 85: Line 81:
In these above quotes, William Branham says that he doesn't agree with Clarence Larkin or other commentaries.  This gives the impression that the doctrine he preached was his own original ideas or lessons he received directly from the Angel (and not from anywhere else).  '''But did he?'''  Let's take a close look and compare what William Branham says to Clarence Larkin's books.
In these above quotes, William Branham says that he doesn't agree with Clarence Larkin or other commentaries.  This gives the impression that the doctrine he preached was his own original ideas or lessons he received directly from the Angel (and not from anywhere else).  '''But did he?'''  Let's take a close look and compare what William Branham says to Clarence Larkin's books.


===Plagiarism in the Patmos Vision===
==Plagiarism in the Patmos Vision==
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
!What William Branham Said
!What William Branham Said
Line 179: Line 175:
|}
|}


===Plagiarism in the Church Ages===
==Plagiarism in the Church Ages==


::'''Main article: [[The Seven Churches Ages]]'''
::'''Main article: [[The Seven Churches Ages]]'''
Line 256: Line 252:
|}
|}


===Plagiarism in the Breach Between the Seals and the Church Ages===
==Plagiarism in the Breach Between the Seals and the Church Ages==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 275: Line 271:
|}
|}


===Plagiarism in the Seven Seals (click on the links below)===
=Plagiarism in the Seven Seals (click on the links below)=


::'''Main article: The [[Seven Seals]]'''
::'''Main article: The [[Seven Seals]]'''
Line 287: Line 283:
#[[Seventh Seal#Plagiarism|Plagiarism in the Seventh Seal]]
#[[Seventh Seal#Plagiarism|Plagiarism in the Seventh Seal]]


===Plagiarism in the Seventy Weeks of Daniel===
=Plagiarism in the Seventy Weeks of Daniel=


In his copyrighted 1919 book, “The Book of Revelation”, after Clarence Larkin wrote about Revelation chapter 5, he then took a bit of a sidestep to discuss the Seventieth Week in the Book of Daniel. Larkin later went on to write an entirely separate book titled “The Book of Daniel” (1929), which also spoke on his ideas regarding Daniel’s 70th week and its link to the book of Revelation.
In his copyrighted 1919 book, “The Book of Revelation”, after Clarence Larkin wrote about Revelation chapter 5, he then took a bit of a sidestep to discuss the Seventieth Week in the Book of Daniel. Larkin later went on to write an entirely separate book titled “The Book of Daniel” (1929), which also spoke on his ideas regarding Daniel’s 70th week and its link to the book of Revelation.
Line 336: Line 332:


According to ordinary chronology, the 475 years from B. C. 445 to A. D. 30 are “Solar” years of 365 days each. Now counting the years from B. C. 445 to A. D. 30, inclusively, we have '''476 solar years'''. Multiplying these '''476 years by 365''' (the number of days in a Solar year), we have 173,740 days, to which add 119 days for leap years, and we have 173,859 days. Add to these 20 days inclusive from March 14 to April 2, and we have 173,879 days. Divide 173, 879 by 360 (the number of days in a “Prophetical Year”), and we have '''483 years''' all to one day, the exact number of days (483) in 69 weeks, each day standing for a year. '''Could there be anything more conclusive''' to prove that Daniel’s 69 weeks ran out on April 2, A. D. 30, the day that Jesus rode in triumph into the City of Jerusalem.<ref>Clarence Larkin, Dispensational Truth, or “God’s Plan and Purpose in the Ages“ (Philadelphia, PA: Clarence Larkin, 1918), 49–50.</ref>
According to ordinary chronology, the 475 years from B. C. 445 to A. D. 30 are “Solar” years of 365 days each. Now counting the years from B. C. 445 to A. D. 30, inclusively, we have '''476 solar years'''. Multiplying these '''476 years by 365''' (the number of days in a Solar year), we have 173,740 days, to which add 119 days for leap years, and we have 173,859 days. Add to these 20 days inclusive from March 14 to April 2, and we have 173,879 days. Divide 173, 879 by 360 (the number of days in a “Prophetical Year”), and we have '''483 years''' all to one day, the exact number of days (483) in 69 weeks, each day standing for a year. '''Could there be anything more conclusive''' to prove that Daniel’s 69 weeks ran out on April 2, A. D. 30, the day that Jesus rode in triumph into the City of Jerusalem.<ref>Clarence Larkin, Dispensational Truth, or “God’s Plan and Purpose in the Ages“ (Philadelphia, PA: Clarence Larkin, 1918), 49–50.</ref>
|-
|
|
|-
|
|
|-
|
|
|-
|
|
|-
|
|
|-
|-
|}
|}


===Plagiarism in other Sermons===
=Plagiarism in other Sermons=
William Branham must have read a lot of Clarence Larkin because he plagiarized him in a number of his key theological teachings.
William Branham must have read a lot of Clarence Larkin because he plagiarized him in a number of his key theological teachings.


====Satan's Superman====
==Satan's Superman==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 371: Line 352:
|}
|}


====Satan's Trinity====
==Satan's Trinity==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 398: Line 379:
|}
|}


====Future Home====
==Future Home==


In the sermon, The Future Home Of The Heavenly Bridegroom And The Earthly Bride, William Branham states:
In the sermon, The Future Home Of The Heavenly Bridegroom And The Earthly Bride, William Branham states:
Line 458: Line 439:
|}
|}


====How to interpret scripture====
=How to interpret scripture=


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 480: Line 461:
|}
|}


====The gates to the soul====
==The gates to the soul==
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
!What William Branham Said
!What William Branham Said
Line 495: Line 476:
|}
|}


====The Token====
==The Token==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 518: Line 499:
|}
|}


====The trail of the serpent====
==The trail of the serpent==
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
!What William Branham Said
!What William Branham Said
Line 534: Line 515:
'''
'''


==C.L. Franklin==
=C.L. Franklin=
 
C. L. Franklin was an American Baptist minister and civil rights activist.  Known as the man with the "Million-Dollar Voice", Franklin served as the pastor of New Bethel Baptist Church in Detroit, Michigan, from 1946 until he was shot and wounded in 1979. Franklin was the father of the American singer and songwriter Aretha Franklin.  
C. L. Franklin was an American Baptist minister and civil rights activist.  Known as the man with the "Million-Dollar Voice", Franklin served as the pastor of New Bethel Baptist Church in Detroit, Michigan, from 1946 until he was shot and wounded in 1979. Franklin was the father of the American singer and songwriter Aretha Franklin.  


Line 589: Line 569:
[[Image:Cigarette ad for a thinking mans filter.jpg|thumb|right|250px]]
[[Image:Cigarette ad for a thinking mans filter.jpg|thumb|right|250px]]


==Billy Graham==
=Billy Graham=


*Where did the inspiration for William Branham's sermon, "A Thinking Man's Filter", come from?
*Where did the inspiration for William Branham's sermon, "A Thinking Man's Filter", come from?
Line 635: Line 615:
William Branham made it clear in one story that he didn't pick up the cigarette package.  Then in the next he says that the Holy Spirit told him to pick it up.  Why did the story change? Is William Branham being truthful with the origins of his doctrines and stories, or is he doing exactly what is spoken about in Jeremiah 23:30?
William Branham made it clear in one story that he didn't pick up the cigarette package.  Then in the next he says that the Holy Spirit told him to pick it up.  Why did the story change? Is William Branham being truthful with the origins of his doctrines and stories, or is he doing exactly what is spoken about in Jeremiah 23:30?


==Ellen G. White==
=Ellen G. White=


Ellen White, the "prophet" and founder of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, stated that:
Ellen White, the "prophet" and founder of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, stated that:
Line 647: Line 627:
Details of this plagiarized "prophecy" can be found in our article entitled "[[Don't Eat Eggs]]".
Details of this plagiarized "prophecy" can be found in our article entitled "[[Don't Eat Eggs]]".


===Ellen White was also a plagiarist?===
==Ellen White was also a plagiarist?==


The four techniques essential to the white­lie brand of super salesmanship are: (a) to play up anything unusual or mysterious about the one to be venerated, so that he or she becomes seen as at a supernatural level; (h) to exalt the acts and utterances to the virtuous and miraculous level, thus reinforcing the idea of the supernatural connection; (c) to deny access to information and records of the events and facts of the past; and (d) to buy time so as to get as far as possible from the point of living knowledge of the beginnings of the legend.
The four techniques essential to the white­lie brand of super salesmanship are: (a) to play up anything unusual or mysterious about the one to be venerated, so that he or she becomes seen as at a supernatural level; (h) to exalt the acts and utterances to the virtuous and miraculous level, thus reinforcing the idea of the supernatural connection; (c) to deny access to information and records of the events and facts of the past; and (d) to buy time so as to get as far as possible from the point of living knowledge of the beginnings of the legend.
Line 673: Line 653:
:''This information may or may not disturb those who now say that the group of pioneers sat around the table and worked out in conjunction with Ellen their ideas and theology. But it does indeed disturb those who were taught that such ideas and theology originated with greater authority and mystique than the common ideas of human endeavor seem to command.<ref>Ellen G. White, Prophet? or Plagiarist!, The White Lie! By Walter T. Rea</ref>
:''This information may or may not disturb those who now say that the group of pioneers sat around the table and worked out in conjunction with Ellen their ideas and theology. But it does indeed disturb those who were taught that such ideas and theology originated with greater authority and mystique than the common ideas of human endeavor seem to command.<ref>Ellen G. White, Prophet? or Plagiarist!, The White Lie! By Walter T. Rea</ref>


==William Sowders==
=William Sowders=


For details on the similarities with [[William Sowders]], please go to [[William Sowders|the article on how William Branham appears to have copied doctrinal teachings from Sowders]].
For details on the similarities with [[William Sowders]], please go to [[William Sowders|the article on how William Branham appears to have copied doctrinal teachings from Sowders]].


==Questions and Answers on Plagiarism==
=Questions and Answers on Plagiarism=


We have received several emails on the subject of William Branham's plagiarism.  Our responses to these questions can be found in our article entitled [[Q&A:Plagiarism]].
We have received several emails on the subject of William Branham's plagiarism.  Our responses to these questions can be found in our article entitled [[Q&A:Plagiarism]].