Jump to content

Supernatural: The Life of William Branham: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
#William Branham's books and sermons.
#William Branham's books and sermons.


=Lack of proper research produces errors=
=Errors resulting from a lack of proper research=


The lack of credible research is reflected throughout the book on an almost constant basis.  For example:
The lack of credible research is reflected throughout the book on an almost constant basis.  For example:
Line 28: Line 28:
#Jorgensen states that '''in 1954, William Branham dined with King Farouk in Cairo, Egypt, but fails to note that Farouk was forced into exile in 1952''' and therefore William Branham's statement was not true as King Farouk was not in Egypt in 1954. (Book Four, Pg. 156)
#Jorgensen states that '''in 1954, William Branham dined with King Farouk in Cairo, Egypt, but fails to note that Farouk was forced into exile in 1952''' and therefore William Branham's statement was not true as King Farouk was not in Egypt in 1954. (Book Four, Pg. 156)
#The author states in Book Six, pg. 149 that William Branham "''did not borrow from the past, or copy from his contemporaries; he blazed a new trail''", thus demonstrating that even in his analytical comments, Jorgensen is out of touch with reality.  All one has to do is read our article on [[Plagiarism|plagiarism]] to determine how incorrect his statement was.
#The author states in Book Six, pg. 149 that William Branham "''did not borrow from the past, or copy from his contemporaries; he blazed a new trail''", thus demonstrating that even in his analytical comments, Jorgensen is out of touch with reality.  All one has to do is read our article on [[Plagiarism|plagiarism]] to determine how incorrect his statement was.
=Failure to deal with significant issues=
[[Condensed List of Issues with the Message|Well over a hundred significant issues relating to William Branham and his message have been identified.  Yet, Jorgensen does not deal with any of these major issues in his pseudo-biography.
A few examples of issues he failed to research or comment on include:
#[[The Municipal Bridge Vision|The failed fulfillment of [[the municipal bridge vision]];
#[[The Brown Bear Vision|The failed vision of the brown bear]];
#[[The Vision of the Meetings in South Africa|The failure of the vision of the meetings in South Africa]];
#[[Heavenly Vision|The discrepancies in William Branham's commission by a heavenly vision]];
#[[Roy Davis|The fabrications around when William Branham embraced Pentecostalism]]; and
#[[Credibility|General problems and concerns relating to Branham's overall credibility.


{{Portal Navigation}}
{{Portal Navigation}}
|-
|-
|}
|}