Controversy over the Date of Easter: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{[Top of Page}} Starting with Sixtus, a Bishop of Rome in 117 AD, the date and order of the passover/Eucharist became the first significant division within the Christian chur...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 17:28, 21 July 2014
{[Top of Page}}
Starting with Sixtus, a Bishop of Rome in 117 AD, the date and order of the passover/Eucharist became the first significant division within the Christian churches.
The first internal evidence of a Bishop exerting influence over another Bishop is Sixtus I of Rome who, in 117 AD, declared that any Bishop visiting Rome should not be accepted back without a letter of recommendation. This doctrine was not accepted by the other churches at that time.
Sixtus' influence is in contrast to the deeds of the early Bishops of Rome, including Linus (who according to Irenaeus was mentioned by Paul in the epistle to Timothy) and Clement, the latter of which wrote to the Corinthians when they had some trouble, and said:
- submit yourselves to the presbyters, and receive correction so as to repent...For it is better for you that ye should occupy a humble but honourable place in the flock of Christ, than that, being highly exalted, ye should be cast out from the hope of His people. (The Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians, CHAP. LVII)
The Bishops in Rome continued with this feeling of supremacy until Polycarp, frusterated by their attempts to influence the other churches over trivial matters, traveled to Rome personally and laid to rest the issue of the date of the Passover/Eucharist. Anicetus (the then Bishop of Rome) submitted to Polycarp's rebuke, and agreed that each church should have the right to determine the date of the Passover/Eucharist independantly.
Polycarp also influenced Anicetus to condemn certain heresies with more vigor.
Footnotes