Who determines what is false doctrine?: Difference between revisions

    From BelieveTheSign
    (Created page with "{{Top of Page}} Who determines what qualifies as false doctrine? Is it William Branham? Is it the Roman Catholic church? Is is some denomination? The better question is th...")
     
     
    (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
    Line 4: Line 4:
    =The question that was directed to us=
    =The question that was directed to us=


    In the catholic faith, this is the Pope or the teaching magisterium that determines the true meaning of scripture on matters of morals and faith. I don't necessarily agree, but that is one model.
    A message follower directed the following question to us on our Facebook discussion page:


    In denominations, there is usually a statement of faith. Who developed these? Holy Ghost filled, born again believers? Who really knows in each case. Many denominations have vastly different beliefs. So someone is wrong.
    :''Who determines false doctrine? Honestly... this is an important point for all Christians to ponder.  


    Is it tradition that determines true and "false" doctrine?
    :''For Roman Catholics, this is the Pope or the teaching magisterium that determines the true meaning of scripture on matters of morals and faith. I don't necessarily agree, but that is one model.  In denominations, there is usually a statement of faith. Who developed these? Holy Ghost filled, born again believers? Who really knows in each case. Many denominations have vastly different beliefs. So someone is wrong.


    My point is that people make the claim that X is a false doctrine, or so and so is "off the Word". But based on what authority do they say that? There own? Because that is the standard tradition in Christianity over the past 2000 years?
    :''Is it tradition that determines true and "false" doctrine?  My point is that people make the claim that X is a false doctrine, or so and so is "off the Word". But based on what authority do they say that? Theie own? Because that is the standard tradition in Christianity over the past 2000 years?


    I like this post topic and exchange because it has really caused me to ponder this question once again.
    :''I like this post topic and exchange because it has really caused me to ponder this question once again.  So often this kind of discussion ends in something like "my scholar is smarter than your scholar" .....or so and so has studied the Greek for 30 years....


    So often this kind of discussion ends in something like "my scholar is smarter than your scholar" .....or so and so has studied the greek for 30 years....
    :''I personally think this is a faulty premise. Scholarship is not a biblical proof of authority. If it were, then Jesus would have probably commended the Pharisees on their studies. (Please, please do not assume I hold this position simply to support William Branham's 7th grade education. Not everything I say comes from, or is meant to simply support the message)


    I personally think this is a faulty premise. Scholarship is not a biblical proof of authority. If it were, then Jesus would have probably commended the Pharisees on their studies.
    :''I look for patterns in the bible. I look at how God operated in the past for clues how he may operate in the future. One such pattern is that God chooses to confound the wise. So we need to be careful if we find ourself leaning on the wise exclusively.


    (please, please do not assume I hold this position simply to support WMB's 7th grade education. Not everything I say comes from, or is meant to simply support the message)
    :''In my opinion... too much knowledge can create a blind spot on someone. They won't be able to see past their set of truths if something comes along that is outside their list of truth. I think this is why Jesus chose the disciples that he chose.


    I look for patterns in the bible. I look at how God operated in the past for clues how he may operate in the future.
    :''We need to be careful if we build a model or a methodology whereby we can "study ourselves into the kingdom".


    One such pattern is that God chooses to confound the wise. So we need to be careful if we find ourself leaning on the wise exclusively.
    We think that this is a valid question that should be addressed. Specifically, we will try to address the question - How should Christians generally determine what is false doctrine and what is not?


    In my opinion... to much knowledge can create a blind spot on someone. They won't be able to see past their set of truths if something comes along that is outside their list of truth. I think this is why Jesus chose the disciples that he chose.
    ==Our response==


    We need to be careful if we build a model or a methodology whereby we can "study ourselves into the kingdom".
    From our research and experience, false doctrine has five characteristics:
     
    :1. '''False doctrine is based on scripture.'''  We see this reflected in Acts 20:30:
     
    :::''Even some men from your own group will rise up and '''distort the truth''' in order to draw a following.<ref>Tyndale House Publishers, Holy Bible: New Living Translation (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2015), Ac 20:30.</ref>
     
    ::Also in 2 Peter 3:15-16
     
    :::''...as also our dear brother Paul wrote to you, according to the wisdom given to him, 3:16 speaking of these things in all his letters. Some things in these letters are hard to understand, things the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they also do to the rest of the scriptures.<ref>Biblical Studies Press, The NET Bible First Edition; Bible. English. NET Bible.; The NET Bible (Biblical Studies Press, 2005), 2 Pe 3:15–16.</ref>
     
    :2. '''False doctrine is plausible.'''  No one is going to be led astray by a false teaching that makes no sense.
     
    :3. '''False doctrine is self-centred and self-focused.'''  As noted in Acts 20:30, the purpose of false doctrine is for the false teacher to draw a following.  The followers of false doctrine group together and generally exclude those who do not believe their pet doctrines.
     
    :4. '''False doctrine is reductionist.'''  Reductionism is where you make a main thing into the only thing or make a partial thing the whole thing. The greatest heresies do not come about by straightforward denial; most of the church will see that for what it is. They happen when an element which may even be important, but isn’t central, looms so large that people can’t help talking about it, fixating on it, debating different views of it as though this were the only thing that mattered.<ref>N. T. WRIGHT as quoted in Hirsch, Alan; Nelson, Mark. Reframation: Seeing God, People, and Mission Through Reenchanted Frames (p. 45). 100 Movements Publishing.</ref>  In the message, the Gospel is reduced to "God sent a prophet." Failure to believe that means that you have not truly accepted the Gospel.
     
    :In its original meaning, the word heresy does not infer that someone is wrong or has believed a falsehood. Rather, it simply refers to a particular truth or belief that has been extracted from its true and complete context and is subsequently treated as if it were the whole truth. This explains why every heretic in the history of the church has had a verse or two of Scripture they rigidly hold to.  The heretic becomes increasingly obsessive and sectarian by making the newly recovered particular truth into the whole truth. Its real meaning is obscured because it is separated from the greater Truth from which it has been extracted.12 Truth thereby becomes fragmented.<ref>Hirsch, Alan; Nelson, Mark. Reframation: Seeing God, People, and Mission Through Reenchanted Frames (pp. 48-49). 100 Movements Publishing</ref>
     
    :5. '''False doctrine is divisive.'''  We read in Titus 3:10:
     
    ::''As for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice, have nothing more to do with him, knowing that such a person is warped and sinful; he is self-condemned.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), Tt 3:10–11.</ref>


    =What the Bible says=
    =What the Bible says=
    ==False teachers look like the real thing==
    And what I am doing I will continue to do, in order to undermine the claim of those who would like to claim that in their boasted mission they work on the same terms as we do. 13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. 14 And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. 15 So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 2 Co 11:12–15.</ref>
     Yet because of false brothers secretly brought in—who slipped in to spy out our freedom that we have in Christ Jesus, so that they might bring us into slavery— 5 to them we did not yield in submission even for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might be preserved for you.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Ga 2:4–5.</ref>
    The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders, 10 and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false, 12 in order that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 2 Th 2:9–12.</ref>
    3 As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus so that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine, 4 nor to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the stewardship from God that is by faith...<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Ti 1:3–4.</ref>
    Teach and urge these things. 3 If anyone teaches a different doctrine and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the teaching that accords with godliness, 4 he is puffed up with conceit and understands nothing. He has an unhealthy craving for controversy and for quarrels about words, which produce envy, dissension, slander, evil suspicions, 5 and constant friction among people who are depraved in mind and deprived of the truth, imagining that godliness is a means of gain.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Ti 6:2–5.</ref>
    And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts, 20 knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation. 21 For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
    2 But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2 And many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of truth will be blasphemed. 3 And in their greed they will exploit you with false words. Their condemnation from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 2 Pe 1:19–2:3.</ref>
    Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3 and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already. 4 Little children, you are from God and have overcome them, for he who is in you is greater than he who is in the world. 5 They are from the world; therefore they speak from the world, and the world listens to them. 6 We are from God. Whoever knows God listens to us; whoever is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the Spirit of truth and the spirit of error.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Jn 4:1–6.</ref>
    ==False teachers must be rebuked==
    Paul said that an overseer in the church must be able not only “to give instruction in sound doctrine” but also “to confute those who contradict it”:
    :Titus 1:9: ''He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to '''rebuke those who contradict it'''.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Tt 1:9.</ref>
    :2 Timothy 2:24-25: ''...able to teach, patiently enduring evil, '''correcting his opponents with gentleness'''. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth...<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 2 Ti 2:24–25.</ref>
    :Titus 2:7-8: ''Show yourself in all respects to be a model of good works, and in your teaching show integrity, dignity, and sound speech that cannot be condemned, '''so that an opponent may be put to shame, having nothing evil to say about us'''.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Tt 2:7–8.</ref>




    Latest revision as of 21:43, 5 November 2022

    Click on headings to expand them, or links to go to specific articles.

    Who determines what qualifies as false doctrine? Is it William Branham? Is it the Roman Catholic church? Is is some denomination? The better question is this - How do I, as a Christian, determine what constitutes false doctrine?

    The question that was directed to us

    A message follower directed the following question to us on our Facebook discussion page:

    Who determines false doctrine? Honestly... this is an important point for all Christians to ponder.
    For Roman Catholics, this is the Pope or the teaching magisterium that determines the true meaning of scripture on matters of morals and faith. I don't necessarily agree, but that is one model. In denominations, there is usually a statement of faith. Who developed these? Holy Ghost filled, born again believers? Who really knows in each case. Many denominations have vastly different beliefs. So someone is wrong.
    Is it tradition that determines true and "false" doctrine? My point is that people make the claim that X is a false doctrine, or so and so is "off the Word". But based on what authority do they say that? Theie own? Because that is the standard tradition in Christianity over the past 2000 years?
    I like this post topic and exchange because it has really caused me to ponder this question once again. So often this kind of discussion ends in something like "my scholar is smarter than your scholar" .....or so and so has studied the Greek for 30 years....
    I personally think this is a faulty premise. Scholarship is not a biblical proof of authority. If it were, then Jesus would have probably commended the Pharisees on their studies. (Please, please do not assume I hold this position simply to support William Branham's 7th grade education. Not everything I say comes from, or is meant to simply support the message)
    I look for patterns in the bible. I look at how God operated in the past for clues how he may operate in the future. One such pattern is that God chooses to confound the wise. So we need to be careful if we find ourself leaning on the wise exclusively.
    In my opinion... too much knowledge can create a blind spot on someone. They won't be able to see past their set of truths if something comes along that is outside their list of truth. I think this is why Jesus chose the disciples that he chose.
    We need to be careful if we build a model or a methodology whereby we can "study ourselves into the kingdom".

    We think that this is a valid question that should be addressed. Specifically, we will try to address the question - How should Christians generally determine what is false doctrine and what is not?

    Our response

    From our research and experience, false doctrine has five characteristics:

    1. False doctrine is based on scripture. We see this reflected in Acts 20:30:
    Even some men from your own group will rise up and distort the truth in order to draw a following.[1]
    Also in 2 Peter 3:15-16
    ...as also our dear brother Paul wrote to you, according to the wisdom given to him, 3:16 speaking of these things in all his letters. Some things in these letters are hard to understand, things the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they also do to the rest of the scriptures.[2]
    2. False doctrine is plausible. No one is going to be led astray by a false teaching that makes no sense.
    3. False doctrine is self-centred and self-focused. As noted in Acts 20:30, the purpose of false doctrine is for the false teacher to draw a following. The followers of false doctrine group together and generally exclude those who do not believe their pet doctrines.
    4. False doctrine is reductionist. Reductionism is where you make a main thing into the only thing or make a partial thing the whole thing. The greatest heresies do not come about by straightforward denial; most of the church will see that for what it is. They happen when an element which may even be important, but isn’t central, looms so large that people can’t help talking about it, fixating on it, debating different views of it as though this were the only thing that mattered.[3] In the message, the Gospel is reduced to "God sent a prophet." Failure to believe that means that you have not truly accepted the Gospel.
    In its original meaning, the word heresy does not infer that someone is wrong or has believed a falsehood. Rather, it simply refers to a particular truth or belief that has been extracted from its true and complete context and is subsequently treated as if it were the whole truth. This explains why every heretic in the history of the church has had a verse or two of Scripture they rigidly hold to. The heretic becomes increasingly obsessive and sectarian by making the newly recovered particular truth into the whole truth. Its real meaning is obscured because it is separated from the greater Truth from which it has been extracted.12 Truth thereby becomes fragmented.[4]
    5. False doctrine is divisive. We read in Titus 3:10:
    As for a person who stirs up division, after warning him once and then twice, have nothing more to do with him, knowing that such a person is warped and sinful; he is self-condemned.[5]

    What the Bible says

    False teachers look like the real thing

    And what I am doing I will continue to do, in order to undermine the claim of those who would like to claim that in their boasted mission they work on the same terms as we do. 13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. 14 And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. 15 So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.[6]

     Yet because of false brothers secretly brought in—who slipped in to spy out our freedom that we have in Christ Jesus, so that they might bring us into slavery— 5 to them we did not yield in submission even for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might be preserved for you.[7]

    The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders, 10 and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false, 12 in order that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.[8]


    3 As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus so that you may charge certain persons not to teach any different doctrine, 4 nor to devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculations rather than the stewardship from God that is by faith...[9]


    Teach and urge these things. 3 If anyone teaches a different doctrine and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the teaching that accords with godliness, 4 he is puffed up with conceit and understands nothing. He has an unhealthy craving for controversy and for quarrels about words, which produce envy, dissension, slander, evil suspicions, 5 and constant friction among people who are depraved in mind and deprived of the truth, imagining that godliness is a means of gain.[10]


    And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts, 20 knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone’s own interpretation. 21 For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.

    2 But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2 And many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of truth will be blasphemed. 3 And in their greed they will exploit you with false words. Their condemnation from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep.[11]


    Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3 and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already. 4 Little children, you are from God and have overcome them, for he who is in you is greater than he who is in the world. 5 They are from the world; therefore they speak from the world, and the world listens to them. 6 We are from God. Whoever knows God listens to us; whoever is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the Spirit of truth and the spirit of error.[12]

    False teachers must be rebuked

    Paul said that an overseer in the church must be able not only “to give instruction in sound doctrine” but also “to confute those who contradict it”:

    Titus 1:9: He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it.[13]
    2 Timothy 2:24-25: ...able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth...[14]
    Titus 2:7-8: Show yourself in all respects to be a model of good works, and in your teaching show integrity, dignity, and sound speech that cannot be condemned, so that an opponent may be put to shame, having nothing evil to say about us.[15]



    Footnotes

    1. ↑ Tyndale House Publishers, Holy Bible: New Living Translation (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, 2015), Ac 20:30.
    2. ↑ Biblical Studies Press, The NET Bible First Edition; Bible. English. NET Bible.; The NET Bible (Biblical Studies Press, 2005), 2 Pe 3:15–16.
    3. ↑ N. T. WRIGHT as quoted in Hirsch, Alan; Nelson, Mark. Reframation: Seeing God, People, and Mission Through Reenchanted Frames (p. 45). 100 Movements Publishing.
    4. ↑ Hirsch, Alan; Nelson, Mark. Reframation: Seeing God, People, and Mission Through Reenchanted Frames (pp. 48-49). 100 Movements Publishing
    5. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), Tt 3:10–11.
    6. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 2 Co 11:12–15.
    7. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Ga 2:4–5.
    8. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 2 Th 2:9–12.
    9. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Ti 1:3–4.
    10. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Ti 6:2–5.
    11. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 2 Pe 1:19–2:3.
    12. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Jn 4:1–6.
    13. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Tt 1:9.
    14. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 2 Ti 2:24–25.
    15. ↑ The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), Tt 2:7–8.


    Navigation

    Retrieved from "http:///index.php?title=Who_determines_what_is_false_doctrine%3F&oldid=26705"