Jump to content

Red Herring Arguments: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 70: Line 70:
The construction with the accusative, however, describes a hearing which includes mental apprehension of the message spoken. From this it becomes evident that the two passages are not contradictory.
The construction with the accusative, however, describes a hearing which includes mental apprehension of the message spoken. From this it becomes evident that the two passages are not contradictory.


Acts 22:9 does not deny that the associates of Paul heard certain sounds; it simply declares that they did not hear in such a way as to understand what was being said.  Our English idiom in this case simply is not so expressive as the Greek<ref>Josh McDowell and Don Douglas Stewart, Answers to Tough Questions (Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers, 1993)</ref>.
Acts 22:9 does not deny that the associates of Paul heard certain sounds; it simply declares that they did not hear in such a way as to understand what was being said.  Our English idiom in this case simply is not so expressive as the Greek.
 
 


==Differences in Paul's Conversion Experiences==
==Differences in Paul's Conversion Experiences==
Line 81: Line 79:
=References=
=References=


{{reflist}}
Josh McDowell and Don Douglas Stewart, Answers to Tough Questions (Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers, 1993)