3,880
edits
Did William Branham Teach Oneness?: Difference between revisions
→William Branham and Modalism
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
William Branham referred to "Lord Jesus Christ" as the name of God, and to the "Father, Son and Holy Spirit" as titles of God. But this isn't right. For example, "Christ" is a title. It means "Messaiah" or "anointed one", while "Holy Spirit" is the best name form the Spirit of God that can be found. "Lord" also reflects the authority of Jesus. But referring to "Lord" as "Father" both removes authority from Jesus, and removes his identity as the Son of God. | |||
Jesus is the Son of God. Jesus is the Christ. Jesus is Lord, and Jesus is God. The basis for those statements can all be found in scripture. Saying that Holy Spirit is a title and that Christ is the Name is not scriptural. | |||
= Unitarianism verses Oneness = | = Unitarianism verses Oneness = | ||