Jump to content

Did William Branham Teach Oneness?: Difference between revisions

Line 63: Line 63:


= Unitarianism verses Oneness =
= Unitarianism verses Oneness =
There are many who confuse the terms [[unitarian]] and Oneness. This is because both essentially believe that God can only exist as a single "unit," or monad.  He cannot be divided into separate parts, or a plurality of "persons" and still exist as a whole deity.  Although unitarians and Oneness are similar in the belief that there is not a plurality of persons in the Godhead, unitarians believe that Jesus was only a moral authority whereas the deity and humanity of Jesus Christ is essential to Oneness doctrine.
There are many who confuse the terms unitarian and Oneness. This is because both essentially believe that God can only exist as a single "unit," or monad.  He cannot be divided into separate parts, or a plurality of "persons" and still exist as a whole deity.  Although unitarians and Oneness are similar in the belief that there is not a plurality of persons in the Godhead, unitarians believe that Jesus was only a moral authority whereas the deity and humanity of Jesus Christ is essential to Oneness doctrine.


In Oneness theology there is an existential distinction, where God in the incarnation comes to exist in Christ in complete human existence and continues to exist as God eternally as Spirit ("Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us" - {{bibleverse||Matthew|1:23}}).
In Oneness theology there is an existential distinction, where God in the incarnation comes to exist in Christ in complete human existence and continues to exist as God eternally as Spirit ("Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us" (Matthew 1:23).