Jump to content

Theology: Difference between revisions

114 bytes added ,  11 years ago
Line 27: Line 27:
He often did not provide any (or inadequate) scriptural backing for his theological positions and seemed to have little or no proper understanding of differing understandings of scripture.
He often did not provide any (or inadequate) scriptural backing for his theological positions and seemed to have little or no proper understanding of differing understandings of scripture.


For example, his rejection of the concept of [[Eternal Sonship]] was based on his personal opinion and not on scripture.
Some examples of his lazy theology are as follows:
 
*[[The Prophet and The Eagle|An eagle in the Bible is a type of a prophet]]
*His rejection of the concept of [[Eternal Sonship]] based on his personal opinion and not on scripture.
*


He insisted that water baptism had to be in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, yet there is no record in the New Testament of anyone every having been baptized that way.
He insisted that water baptism had to be in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, yet there is no record in the New Testament of anyone every having been baptized that way.