11,141
edits
Theology: Difference between revisions
→Lazy Theology
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
William Branham's approach to theology could be considered "lazy" or perhaps "sloppy". | William Branham's approach to theology could be considered "lazy" or perhaps "sloppy". | ||
He often did not provide any (or inadequate) scriptural backing for his theological positions and seemed to have little or no proper understanding of differing understandings of scripture. | |||
For example, his rejection of the concept of [[Eternal Sonship]] was based on his personal opinion and not on scripture. | |||
He insisted that water baptism had to be in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, yet there is no record in the New Testament of anyone every having been baptized that way. | |||