Jump to content

William Branham speaks in tongues: Difference between revisions

William Branham speaks in tongues (view source)

Revision as of 15:15, 14 May 2017

384 bytes removed ,  6 years ago
no edit summary
No edit summary
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Top of Page}}
{{Top of Page}}
[[Image:1 Timothy 4 1.jpg|thumb|right|250px]]
{{Template:Discernment errors}}
Many followers admit that their "prophet" did  make mistakes, but these were all minor.  They also state that we must avoid examining those mistakes and simply look at when he was under the "anointing", when the "Angel" was standing beside him. 


Some of his followers, having been exposed to several critical flaws in the fundamental teachings of William Branham, even acknowledge that the sermons themselves contain several errors, but the prayer lines were "God's Voice to us."  So let us turn our attention to one specific prayer line.
This article deals with one specific '''discernment from the audience in 1959'''.


=Calling a person out of the audience - April 11, 1959=
=Calling a person out of the audience - April 11, 1959=
Line 18: Line 17:


But is that what happened?
But is that what happened?
 
[[Image:1 Timothy 4 1.jpg|thumb|right|250px]]
=What actually happened=
=What actually happened=


While William Branham described this event as an astonishing display of God's power to speak through his prophet in the Finnish language, any who examine the "supernatural" event are a bit shocked at how little "God" actually spoke.  
While William Branham described this event as an astonishing display of God's power to speak through his prophet in the Finnish language, any who examine the "supernatural" event are a bit shocked at how little "God" actually spoke.  


But when you review the details of this event on the night prior to Branham's claim, '''we only find two phrases Branham spoke in English, "Jumalan rauhaa," and "Kiitos"'''. And during the course of these words coming out in the sermon, Branham claims not to have known what he was saying.
But when you review the details of this event on the night prior to Branham's claim, '''we only find two phrases Branham spoke in Finnish, "Jumalan rauhaa," and "Kiitos"'''. And during the course of these words coming out in the sermon, Branham claims not to have known what he was saying.


There is just one problem with William Branham's claim - He had been to Finland. And these words, which he claimed not to have known, were repeatedly used throughout his ministry when speaking to those who knew the Finnish language.  Eight years earlier, in 1951, William Branham referred to his trip to Finland. Interestingly, he mentioned learning the exact words that he claimed to have came to him in an "unknown language" in 1959:
There is just one problem with William Branham's claim - He had been to Finland. And these words, which he claimed not to have known, were repeatedly used throughout his ministry when speaking to those who knew the Finnish language.  Eight years earlier, in 1951, William Branham referred to his trip to Finland. Interestingly, he mentioned learning the exact words that he claimed to have came to him in an "unknown language" in 1959:
Line 53: Line 52:
When William Branham stated that he spoke to a Finnish woman in a language that he didn't understand.  He was telling the truth.  But the truth was also that he did know three Finnish words and those were the only words he spoke.   
When William Branham stated that he spoke to a Finnish woman in a language that he didn't understand.  He was telling the truth.  But the truth was also that he did know three Finnish words and those were the only words he spoke.   


But William Branham was deceptive: 
The question has to be asked - Why was William Branham intentionally deceptive?


#Although William Branham did not know the Finnish language, he did know 3 words.
#Although William Branham did not know the Finnish language, he did know 3 words.
Retrieved from "http:///index.php?title=Special:MobileDiff/22016...22684"