Jump to content

The Evidence of the Holy Spirit: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


=What the Bible says=
=What the Bible says=
What does the Bible say is the evidence of the Holy Spirit in a person's life?


First, there is a subjective testimony of the Holy Spirit within our hearts bearing witness that we are God’s children:
First, there is a subjective testimony of the Holy Spirit within our hearts bearing witness that we are God’s children:
Line 28: Line 29:
Finally, a major area of evidence that we are genuine believers is found in a life of obedience to God’s commands:
Finally, a major area of evidence that we are genuine believers is found in a life of obedience to God’s commands:


:''Whoever says “I know him” but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him, 5 but whoever keeps his word, in him truly the love of God is perfected. By this we may know that we are in him: 6 whoever says he abides in him ought to walk in the same way in which he walked.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Jn 2:4–6.</ref>
:''Whoever says “I know him” but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him, but whoever keeps his word, in him truly the love of God is perfected. By this we may know that we are in him: whoever says he abides in him ought to walk in the same way in which he walked.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Jn 2:4–6.</ref>


:''Whoever keeps his commandments abides in God, and God in him. And by this we know that he abides in us, by the Spirit whom he has given us.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Jn 3:24.</ref>
:''Whoever keeps his commandments abides in God, and God in him. And by this we know that he abides in us, by the Spirit whom he has given us.<ref>The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2001), 1 Jn 3:24.</ref>
Line 61: Line 62:


:''Now, don't you get a hold of that. I spoke with tongues, and that's the evidence of the Holy Ghost." If your life... If you can still cut your hair, if you can still do these things the Bible says not do; you could speak with tongues all day and night, and it's still nothing to do with God. '''The tree is known by its fruit.'''<ref>THE.FLASHING.RED.LIGHT.OF.THE.SIGN.OF.HIS.COMING_  JEFF.IN  V-5 N-4  SUNDAY_  63-0623E</ref>
:''Now, don't you get a hold of that. I spoke with tongues, and that's the evidence of the Holy Ghost." If your life... If you can still cut your hair, if you can still do these things the Bible says not do; you could speak with tongues all day and night, and it's still nothing to do with God. '''The tree is known by its fruit.'''<ref>THE.FLASHING.RED.LIGHT.OF.THE.SIGN.OF.HIS.COMING_  JEFF.IN  V-5 N-4  SUNDAY_  63-0623E</ref>
William Branham even went so far as to state something that was complete nonsense:
:''When it come to being fruits of the Spirit, kind and gentle, '''I guess there wasn't a one of those priest but what could outshine Jesus Christ in it.''' He went to the temple, plaited ropes, looked upon them with anger, and turned over their tables, and run them out of the place. Is that right? The Bible said He looked upon them with anger. The Bible said that. That's exactly right.  So see, '''those priest were gentle, meek, understanding men. When it come to the fruits of the Spirit, they could show more fruits of the Spirit than Jesus ever could.'''<ref>William Branham, 64-0823E - Questions And Answers #2, para. 45-46</ref>
This last statement is, of course, a completely incorrect statement.


==The evidence is believing in William Branham==
==The evidence is believing in William Branham==
Line 80: Line 87:
However, this passage can only be interpreted properly by the context of Jesus' words.  Who was he speaking to?  The disciples!  When the Holy Spirit was poured out on the day of Pentecost, the Spirit did lead them into all truth and they wrote it down on paper to form the New Testament, the source of truth for Christians.  It is clear that the apostles were the divinely authorized agents through which the Holy Spirit proclaimed the final revelation of Jesus Christ.
However, this passage can only be interpreted properly by the context of Jesus' words.  Who was he speaking to?  The disciples!  When the Holy Spirit was poured out on the day of Pentecost, the Spirit did lead them into all truth and they wrote it down on paper to form the New Testament, the source of truth for Christians.  It is clear that the apostles were the divinely authorized agents through which the Holy Spirit proclaimed the final revelation of Jesus Christ.


Indeed, the apostles claimed this revelatory power (John 20:31; 1 Cor. 2:13; 1 Thess. 4:2; 2 Thess. 2:2; 1 John 2:19; 4:6), claiming the church was “built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets” (Eph. 2:20). The early church recognized this authority and “they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching” (Acts 2:42). The apostles were the eyewitnesses of Christ (Acts 1:22), even Paul (1 Cor. 9:1; 15:5–9). Since these divinely authorized channels of “all truth” died in the first century, it follows that divine revelation ceased with them. If revelation ceased, there was no longer a need for miracle signs of a new revelation.<ref>Norman L. Geisler, Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics, Baker Reference Library (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1999), 471.</ref>
Indeed, the apostles claimed this revelatory power (John 20:31; 1 Cor. 2:13; 1 Thess. 4:2; 2 Thess. 2:2; 1 John 2:19; 4:6), claiming the church was “built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets” (Eph. 2:20). The early church recognized this authority and “they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching” (Acts 2:42). The apostles were the eyewitnesses of Christ (Acts 1:22), even Paul (1 Cor. 9:1; 15:5–9). Since these divinely authorized channels of “all truth” died in the first century, it follows that divine revelation ceased with them. If revelation ceased, there was no longer a need for new revelation.<ref>Norman L. Geisler, Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics, Baker Reference Library (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1999), 471.</ref>