Jump to content

William Branham and Arianism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
Line 35: Line 35:
Such, then, was Arianism—a theory of the mutual relations of the Persons in the Trinity based nominally on the words of Scripture, but arrived at really by the methods of the heathen philosophers.<ref>F. J. Foakes-Jackson, “Arianism,” ed. James Hastings, John A. Selbie, and Louis H. Gray, Encyclopædia of Religion and Ethics (Edinburgh; New York: T. & T. Clark; Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1908–1926), 777.</ref>
Such, then, was Arianism—a theory of the mutual relations of the Persons in the Trinity based nominally on the words of Scripture, but arrived at really by the methods of the heathen philosophers.<ref>F. J. Foakes-Jackson, “Arianism,” ed. James Hastings, John A. Selbie, and Louis H. Gray, Encyclopædia of Religion and Ethics (Edinburgh; New York: T. & T. Clark; Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1908–1926), 777.</ref>


[[The Council of Nicaea]] in AD 325 was involved in resolving the dispute over Arianism.
[[The real problem with the Nicene Council|The Council of Nicaea]] in AD 325 was involved in resolving the dispute over Arianism.


==Lee Vayle's Arianism comes from William Branham's teaching==
==Lee Vayle's Arianism comes from William Branham's teaching==