Jump to content

Rise of a Woman in America: Difference between revisions

Line 37: Line 37:
In looking at this prophecy, we need to ask a couple of questions.
In looking at this prophecy, we need to ask a couple of questions.


===Is this prophecy vague?===
===Was this prophecy unique?===
 
Was William Branham the first person to prophecy that a woman would be president?  Or a vice president?
 
According to an article in The Atlantic dated November 1, 2016, predictions of a women president (or presidentess) started even before women had the vote.  A 1910 headline in the ''Meade County News, a Kansas newspaper stated:
 
:'''Mere Man Faces Danger of a Woman Being President of the United States
 
A newspaper advertisement in 1892 predicted that by 1992, a 100 years later, perhaps the first woman would be inaugurated as president.  And in 1928, a Los Angeles Times article humorously predicted that by the year 1975, ''"there will doubtless be a lady President of the Uniteds Sates with a lady Cabinet and a lady Senate."''
 
When William Branham predicted that a woman would be president of the United States at some unknown time in the future, he was not the first to make such a prediction.
 
Simple common sense would tell you that the prediction would come true at some time in the future, however distant that might be.
 
===Was this prophecy vague?===


Is this a prophecy that is sufficiently vague that it will almost certainly be fulfilled?   
Is this a prophecy that is sufficiently vague that it will almost certainly be fulfilled?   
Line 65: Line 79:
This is very hard for people outside the message to understand but this is what is happening in the message.  The followers of William Branham are sadly becoming more and more like a cult.
This is very hard for people outside the message to understand but this is what is happening in the message.  The followers of William Branham are sadly becoming more and more like a cult.


===What if this is a valid prophecy?===
===What if this was a valid prophecy?===


Say that this is a valid prophecy, does it negate the others prophecies that clearly failed?
Say that this is a valid prophecy, does it negate the others prophecies that clearly failed?