11,141
edits
A response to Pastor Wisper Gwena: Difference between revisions
→A response to Pastor Gwena
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::You did give an explanation for the failure for the brown bear vision but your explanation, which will be covered in Part 4 of our series, is not biblical. You give A message pastro's excuse, a pastor who lied to his entire congregation on several occasion, and the excuse would never have worked in the Old Testament. Can you find me an explanation where a prophet says "Thus Saith The Lord" such and such will happen and then it didn't happen '''OUTSIDE OF THE ALLOWABLE REASONS IN SCRIPTURE?''' ([[Failed Prophecies#Jonah prophesied against Nineveh but it was not destroyed|Jeremiah 18:7-8]]) | ::You did give an explanation for the failure for the brown bear vision but your explanation, which will be covered in Part 4 of our series, is not biblical. You give A message pastro's excuse, a pastor who lied to his entire congregation on several occasion, and the excuse would never have worked in the Old Testament. Can you find me an explanation where a prophet says "Thus Saith The Lord" such and such will happen and then it didn't happen '''OUTSIDE OF THE ALLOWABLE REASONS IN SCRIPTURE?''' ([[Failed Prophecies#Jonah prophesied against Nineveh but it was not destroyed|Jeremiah 18:7-8]]) | ||
:''SO LET THIS BE WITH US WHO HAVE A REVELATION ABOUT WILLIAM BRANHAM’S MESSAGE. We are not ashamed to say that we apply exactly the same precedents on the message of Brother Branham because we believe that the message is the truth. There are things that on face value can be criticised in the message, but just like there is an explanation behind the 400 years, there are also explanations about those things you raise criticisms on with the message. Just like you are satisfied with your explanations on the bible, I am also satisfied with my own explanations of such bible scriptures as the 400/430 years which though my explanations may not match yours but still I defend the bible. In a similar way I am also satisfied with my explanations about the message though they may not fit your critic’s position. Not only do my explanations fit me, but we have a whole message community that is very satisfied with the same explanations even after going through your website. You may call us deluded and deceived, but bible critics have called us thus for years and we are unmovable on the bible. In the same way, message critics can call us thus and we remain unmoveable because we have a revelation on what we believe. | |||
::BUT YOU FAILED TO STATE '''HOW''' THE PRECEDENTS ALLOW YOU TO GET AROUND DEUT 18:20-22. You point out the Biblical discrepancies and then you talk about how WMB said that visions worked (although WMB's illustration never explained how a vision failed). But you '''never''' state how the Biblical discrepancies you used somehow exempt WMB's failed visions from Deut 18:20-22. | |||