Jump to content

Theology: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 135: Line 135:
{|style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
{|style="width:100%; vertical-align:top; text-align:left;"
|-
|-
||'''[[Eternal Sonship]]'''. An example of William Branham's lazy theology is his approach to the concept of the eternal sonship of Christ. Why lazy?  Because he believed that God was the eternal Father...and to have a Father you have to have a Son.  
||'''[[Eternal Sonship]]'''. An example of William Branham's lazy theology is his approach to the concept of the eternal sonship of Christ. Why lazy?  Because he believed that God was the eternal Father ...but to be a Father, don't you have to have a Son?  
|-
|-
|}
|}