Jump to content

Supernatural photographs: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg|300px|top]]  [[File:WMB preaching double exposure.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:WMB preaching before double exposure.jpg|300px|top]]  [[File:WMB preaching double exposure.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>


It is clear to anyone that has the slightest knowledge of photography that the second photograph is a "double exposure" (that is, a superimposition of two  exposures to create a single image) photograph.  Additionally, the camera was moved in the second exposure using a fairly slow shutter speed.  This is indicated by the multiple streaks of light that are duplicated in the photograph.


<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Multiple exposure 1.jpg|300px|top]]  [[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
Here are a couple of examples of what happens when a the camera is moved while directed at several point sources of light.  Notice the similarities to the streaks of light in the "supernatural photo" of William Branham.


<p><span style="background:#FFF;color:#000;"><u>[[File:Multiple exposure 1.jpg|400px|top]]  [[File:Analogue Double Exposure Photography of Pre-Wedding.jpg|300px|top]]</u></span></p>
'''The conclusion:''' The picture of William Branham with the streaks of light is an accidental double exposure, something that was fairly easy to do accidentally on the cheap cameras that were common in the 1950's and 1960's.
=Quotes of William Branham=




{{Bottom of Page}}
{{Bottom of Page}}