Jump to content

Congressman Upshaw: Difference between revisions

Line 12: Line 12:
William Branham's testimony (1951) is initially in basic agreement with that of the Congressman.  However, by 1954 it had changed to to the point that there is a vision of a brown suit and a wired microphone is run back to the Congressman to allow him to have a conversation with William Branham from the pulpit.  Leroy Kopp's part in the miracle is completely eliminated as William Branham himself told the Congressman over the pulpit -  "''THUS SAITH THE LORD, you're healed.''"
William Branham's testimony (1951) is initially in basic agreement with that of the Congressman.  However, by 1954 it had changed to to the point that there is a vision of a brown suit and a wired microphone is run back to the Congressman to allow him to have a conversation with William Branham from the pulpit.  Leroy Kopp's part in the miracle is completely eliminated as William Branham himself told the Congressman over the pulpit -  "''THUS SAITH THE LORD, you're healed.''"


Why did a real miracle from God require embellishment? And, can we trust the accuracy of any of William Branham's stories when there is evidence that he embellished this story almost to the point of fiction?  
Why did a real miracle from God require embellishment?


=The tract written by Congressman Upshaw=
=The tract written by Congressman Upshaw=