Jump to content

Marriage and Divorce: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
==New Testament Teaching on the Remarriage Issue Contrasted with that of William Branham==
==New Testament Teaching on the Remarriage Issue Contrasted with that of William Branham==


<u>'''Mark'''</u>
===Mark===


Mark is generally seen as the oldest of the Gospel (i.e. the first one written) so we will start there:
Mark is generally seen as the oldest of the Gospel (i.e. the first one written) so we will start there:
Line 40: Line 40:
Mark is also unique among the Gospels because it records Jesus not only forbidding the man to divorce and remarry but forbidding the wife the same thing.  St Paul also states that Jesus told wives not to divorce their husbands (1 Cor. 7:10).  This was impossible under Jewish law, according to which a wife could sue the courts for divorce but could not directly divorce her husband.
Mark is also unique among the Gospels because it records Jesus not only forbidding the man to divorce and remarry but forbidding the wife the same thing.  St Paul also states that Jesus told wives not to divorce their husbands (1 Cor. 7:10).  This was impossible under Jewish law, according to which a wife could sue the courts for divorce but could not directly divorce her husband.


'''Luke'''
===Luke===


Luke contains a single verse on the issue of divorce:
Luke contains a single verse on the issue of divorce:
Line 51: Line 51:
The second part of the verse adds a new point to that of Mark - it is also adultery for a single man to marry a divorced woman.  The entire verse is addressed to the man. Jesus says: it is wrong to marry another woman after divorcing your wife; it is just as wrong to marry (for the first time) a woman who has been divorced.  In other words, the divorced woman’s first marriage still exists despite the legal divorce and therefore true remarriage is actually impossible in reality, and in God’s eyes (as opposed to those of the law of the land), it can only be adultery.
The second part of the verse adds a new point to that of Mark - it is also adultery for a single man to marry a divorced woman.  The entire verse is addressed to the man. Jesus says: it is wrong to marry another woman after divorcing your wife; it is just as wrong to marry (for the first time) a woman who has been divorced.  In other words, the divorced woman’s first marriage still exists despite the legal divorce and therefore true remarriage is actually impossible in reality, and in God’s eyes (as opposed to those of the law of the land), it can only be adultery.


'''Matthew'''
===Matthew===


Matthew records 2 passages on the issue of divorce, the first being in Matthew 5.
Matthew records 2 passages on the issue of divorce, the first being in Matthew 5.
Line 97: Line 97:
<u>Matthew 19:3-9</u>
<u>Matthew 19:3-9</u>


'':3 The Pharisees also came to Him, testing Him, and saying to Him, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for just any reason?”''  
:''3 The Pharisees also came to Him, testing Him, and saying to Him, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for just any reason?”''  
'':4 And He answered and said to them, “Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’''  
:''4 And He answered and said to them, “Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’''  
'':5 and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?''   
:''5 and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?''   
'':6 So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.”''  
:''6 So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.”''  
'':7 They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to give a certificate of divorce, and to put her away?”''  
:''7 They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to give a certificate of divorce, and to put her away?”''  
'':8 He said to them, “Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, permitted you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so.''   
:''8 He said to them, “Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, permitted you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so.''   
'':9 And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery.”''
:''9 And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery.”''


This passage is Matthew’s account of the incident told in Mark 10:1-12.  As in Matthew 5:32, but unlike the passage in Mark, Matthew’s account contains an exception.  The wording in the Greek is similar here and again uses the Greek word “porneia”.   
This passage is Matthew’s account of the incident told in Mark 10:1-12.  As in Matthew 5:32, but unlike the passage in Mark, Matthew’s account contains an exception.  The wording in the Greek is similar here and again uses the Greek word “porneia”.   
Line 120: Line 120:
Jesus’ response to the dismay of the disciples is also interesting.  He states - “Not everyone can accept this statement, except those to whom it has been given.”  Does this mean that if you can’t accept it you don’t have to?  Does it mean it doesn’t apply to everyone?  Is this principle not practical for everyone? Or is it that not everyone can understand what is being said but only those to whom God had given understanding?  Apparently all of these interpretations are possible from the Greek wording of the passage.
Jesus’ response to the dismay of the disciples is also interesting.  He states - “Not everyone can accept this statement, except those to whom it has been given.”  Does this mean that if you can’t accept it you don’t have to?  Does it mean it doesn’t apply to everyone?  Is this principle not practical for everyone? Or is it that not everyone can understand what is being said but only those to whom God had given understanding?  Apparently all of these interpretations are possible from the Greek wording of the passage.


'''Paul'''
===Paul===


The Corinthians had written to Paul (1 Cor 7:1) specifically asking him questions on a variety of matters which he addresses in his letter to them.  In fact, the second part of 1 Cor 7:1 – “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman” – appears to be a direct quotation from their letter which Paul would be in some agreement.  But he does not agree with how they are using it.
The Corinthians had written to Paul (1 Cor 7:1) specifically asking him questions on a variety of matters which he addresses in his letter to them.  In fact, the second part of 1 Cor 7:1 – “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman” – appears to be a direct quotation from their letter which Paul would be in some agreement.  But he does not agree with how they are using it.
Line 179: Line 179:
The real problem with this passage is that its focus on maintaining mixed marriages (but allowing them to dissolve if the pagan initiates the action) does not offer much help on the problem of remarriage.
The real problem with this passage is that its focus on maintaining mixed marriages (but allowing them to dissolve if the pagan initiates the action) does not offer much help on the problem of remarriage.


<u>The Early Church</u>
===The Early Church===


It should be added that from earliest post-New Testament days, writers in the early church wrote about divorce and remarriage. Almost always their teaching is about remarriage—rather than merely about divorce.  In almost every case they write against remarriage and mention no exceptions.  When writing about divorce they do quite frequently mention the permission—which they quite often make into a command—to divorce where there has been adultery. The overwhelming majority of them do not allow remarriage in these circumstances. Some specifically prohibit it; others simply say: there should be no remarriage after divorce. They mention no exceptions.
It should be added that from earliest post-New Testament days, writers in the early church wrote about divorce and remarriage. Almost always their teaching is about remarriage—rather than merely about divorce.  In almost every case they write against remarriage and mention no exceptions.  When writing about divorce they do quite frequently mention the permission—which they quite often make into a command—to divorce where there has been adultery. The overwhelming majority of them do not allow remarriage in these circumstances. Some specifically prohibit it; others simply say: there should be no remarriage after divorce. They mention no exceptions.