11,153
edits
List of Issues with the Message: Difference between revisions
→Could we trust the message?
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Because the message was basically a "King James Version Only" denomination (and, yes, we believe the message is a "denomination" as that word is commonly defined), we started examining the Bible and which versions we could consider as trustworthy. Through our research over a period of about 9 months, '''it became clear that the Bible was very trustworthy,''' although our understanding was changed somewhat as we clearly understood how the New Testament had been passed down to us today. | Because the message was basically a "King James Version Only" denomination (and, yes, we believe the message is a "denomination" as that word is commonly defined), we started examining the Bible and which versions we could consider as trustworthy. Through our research over a period of about 9 months, '''it became clear that the Bible was very trustworthy,''' although our understanding was changed somewhat as we clearly understood how the New Testament had been passed down to us today. | ||
=== | ===Can we trust the message?=== | ||
We then started to research the message. Our sole purpose was to prove the message to be true so that we could determine how it had been perverted by the message ministers who refused to stand up against sin in the pulpit. | We then started to research the message. Our sole purpose was to prove the message to be true so that we could determine how it had been perverted by the message ministers who refused to stand up against sin in the pulpit. | ||