William Branham and the Trinity Doctrine: Difference between revisions

William Branham and the Trinity Doctrine (view source)

Revision as of 18:06, 13 April 2020

4 bytes removed , 4 years ago

→‎William Branham's flawed view of history

Admin

Bots, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, nuke, Suppressors, Administrators

11,153

edits

Revision as of 18:01, 13 April 2020 (view source) Admin (talk \| contribs) (→‎Quotes of William Branham) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:06, 13 April 2020 (view source) Admin (talk \| contribs) (→‎William Branham's flawed view of history) Newer edit →
Line 47:		Line 47:

	William Branham believed that prior to the Council of Nicea, which met in 325 A.D., the doctrine of the Trinity did not exist. However, his understanding was wrong. He also incorrectly believed that the Nicene Council made a determination between the doctrine of the Trinity and Oneness. The actual dispute was between the doctrine of the Trinity and Arianism, a belief that Jesus was a created being.		William Branham believed that prior to the Council of Nicea, which met in 325 A.D., the doctrine of the Trinity did not exist. However, his understanding was wrong. He also incorrectly believed that the Nicene Council made a determination between the doctrine of the Trinity and Oneness. The actual dispute was between the doctrine of the Trinity and Arianism, a belief that Jesus was a created being.





	The problem that non-Trinitiarians must address from a historical context is that '''no significant leader in the Christian church in the last 1700 years has been non-Trinitarian.''' They all believed and stood for the doctrine of the Trinity.		The problem that non-Trinitiarians must address from a historical context is that '''no significant leader in the Christian church in the last 1700 years has been non-Trinitarian.''' They all believed and stood for the doctrine of the Trinity.