11,158
edits
A response to Tim Pruitt's Defense of William Branham: Difference between revisions
A response to Tim Pruitt's Defense of William Branham (view source)
Revision as of 22:12, 30 December 2019
, 4 years ago→The failed 1977 prediction does classify William Branham as a false prophet
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
:''As a man he could make predictions that didn’t come to pass as he did of 1977. This was something he adamantly declared was not a prediction from God or a prophecy but a prediction based on his own assumption of how quickly the other visions had transpired. Yet because of this prediction, he is regarded as a false prophet by the denominational world. | :''As a man he could make predictions that didn’t come to pass as he did of 1977. This was something he adamantly declared was not a prediction from God or a prophecy but a prediction based on his own assumption of how quickly the other visions had transpired. Yet because of this prediction, he is regarded as a false prophet by the denominational world. | ||
==Who did William Branham think he was?== | |||
Pruitt says that: | |||
:''He knew the difference between his own self and God. | |||
=Tim Pruitt's original article= | =Tim Pruitt's original article= | ||