Jump to content

Is it permissible for women to wear pants?: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with " <youtube>https://youtu.be/nTDfN1JWsFw</youtube> William Branham appears to say (and I expect you will argue against him again, but perhaps not) that if a woman wears pant...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
William Branham taught that '''if a woman wears pants, she simply isn’t a Christian.'''


But is this biblical?  '''What does the Bible say?'''
=What the Bible teaches=


<youtube>https://youtu.be/nTDfN1JWsFw</youtube>
<youtube>https://youtu.be/nTDfN1JWsFw</youtube>


 
The New Testament does not allow a person to bring Old Testament law into the new covenant.   
 
William Branham appears to say (and I expect you will argue against him again, but perhaps not) that if a woman wears pants, she simply isn’t a Christian:
 
:''But if she’s got bobbed hair, wearing makeup, shorts, pants, looks like man’s, all these slacks and ever what they call them; saying those kind of things, and doing those things, and living for the world, she’ll stop; she can’t get through There. No, sir. It’ll stop her at the beginning.  (65-0822E - A Thinking Man's Filter)
 
:''How could you draw a bobbed-hair woman through that Filter? Tell me. How could you ever draw a woman that wears slacks through There, when “It’s an abomination for her to put on a garment pertains to a man”? See, God’s Filter would catch her out there, It wouldn’t let her come in. (65-1207 – Leadership)
 
:''How could a bobbed-haired woman ever come through this Filter? How could a woman with shorts on ever come through It, or slacks, when the Bible says, “It’s an abomination to God, for a woman to put on a garment that even pertains to a man”? (65-0911 - God's Power To Transform)
 
:''Who’s powerful enough to tame this legion stripping the clothes off of our women, in the name of preachers, Methodist, Baptist, and even Pentecostals? Painting their faces like Jezebel, and bobbing their hair, and wearing pants just like men. Our preachers, not enough get up about them to tell them about it. Devil-possessed! It was the legion that tore his clothes off of him. Who is this roaring devil? (61-1119 - Perfect Strength By Perfect Weakness)
 
But I do not think that the New Testament also one to bring Old Testament law into the new covenant.   


I do believe that the New Testament holds women to a standard of modesty (1 Tim. 2:9).  But it is not an issue of salvation.  And it is not an issue of the type of garment.
I do believe that the New Testament holds women to a standard of modesty (1 Tim. 2:9).  But it is not an issue of salvation.  And it is not an issue of the type of garment.
Line 52: Line 44:


Similarly, in Romans Paul is unconcerned if one considers every day to be alike (Rom. 14:5–6). He almost certainly thinks of the Sabbath here, but he reckons it to be a matter of inconsequence. Paul’s attitude of indifference relative to the Sabbath indicates that it is no longer normative. A new era has dawned in which the Mosaic covenant has passed away. This reading is confirmed by Ephesians 2:15. Jews and Gentiles in Christ are now one new man, for Christ has “[abolished] the law of commandments expressed in ordinances.” In other words, one reason Jews and Gentiles are unified is that the requirements of the Mosaic covenant, which separated Jews from Gentiles, have become passé.
Similarly, in Romans Paul is unconcerned if one considers every day to be alike (Rom. 14:5–6). He almost certainly thinks of the Sabbath here, but he reckons it to be a matter of inconsequence. Paul’s attitude of indifference relative to the Sabbath indicates that it is no longer normative. A new era has dawned in which the Mosaic covenant has passed away. This reading is confirmed by Ephesians 2:15. Jews and Gentiles in Christ are now one new man, for Christ has “[abolished] the law of commandments expressed in ordinances.” In other words, one reason Jews and Gentiles are unified is that the requirements of the Mosaic covenant, which separated Jews from Gentiles, have become passé.
=William Branham's opinion=
William Branham taught that if a woman wears pants, she simply isn’t a Christian:
:''But if she’s got bobbed hair, wearing makeup, shorts, pants, looks like man’s, all these slacks and ever what they call them; saying those kind of things, and doing those things, and living for the world, she’ll stop; she can’t get through There. No, sir. It’ll stop her at the beginning.  (65-0822E - A Thinking Man's Filter)
:''How could you draw a bobbed-hair woman through that Filter? Tell me. How could you ever draw a woman that wears slacks through There, when “It’s an abomination for her to put on a garment pertains to a man”? See, God’s Filter would catch her out there, It wouldn’t let her come in. (65-1207 – Leadership)
:''How could a bobbed-haired woman ever come through this Filter? How could a woman with shorts on ever come through It, or slacks, when the Bible says, “It’s an abomination to God, for a woman to put on a garment that even pertains to a man”? (65-0911 - God's Power To Transform)
:''Who’s powerful enough to tame this legion stripping the clothes off of our women, in the name of preachers, Methodist, Baptist, and even Pentecostals? Painting their faces like Jezebel, and bobbing their hair, and wearing pants just like men. Our preachers, not enough get up about them to tell them about it. Devil-possessed! It was the legion that tore his clothes off of him. Who is this roaring devil? (61-1119 - Perfect Strength By Perfect Weakness)