11,153
edits
Is the New Testament historically reliable?: Difference between revisions
Is the New Testament historically reliable? (view source)
Revision as of 19:31, 16 August 2018
, 6 years agono edit summary
(Created page with " =Summary= 1. There are no valid reasons that the New Testament should not be accepted as a reliable historical document. This would include: a. The accounts in the New...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Top of Page}} | |||
| Line 59: | Line 62: | ||
But the Christian faith rests firmly on the eyewitness testimony of the authors of the Gospels. The hope of the Christian faith is not based on a fairy tale or a collection of myths but on the sound evidence that has stood the test of time. Christianity is not afraid of the hard questions that may be asked by the skeptic, as we have found there are solid answers to those questions. | But the Christian faith rests firmly on the eyewitness testimony of the authors of the Gospels. The hope of the Christian faith is not based on a fairy tale or a collection of myths but on the sound evidence that has stood the test of time. Christianity is not afraid of the hard questions that may be asked by the skeptic, as we have found there are solid answers to those questions. | ||
{{Bottom of Page}} | |||
[[Category: Unfinished articles]] | |||