11,154
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
'''We challenge all message ministers and message believers to make a defense of William Branham and his message''' to all former and current message believers that have questions. We have presented [[List of Issues with the Message|detailed reasons why the message is false]] each of which constitutes asking for a "reason" for the hope that is in you. | '''We challenge all message ministers and message believers to make a defense of William Branham and his message''' to all former and current message believers that have questions. We have presented [[List of Issues with the Message|detailed reasons why the message is false]] each of which constitutes asking for a "reason" for the hope that is in you. | ||
='''...And A Challenge To A Debate'''= | =='''...And A Challenge To A Debate'''== | ||
Furthermore, we challenge [[Billy Paul Branham]] or [[Joseph Branham]] to a debate. We also open that challenge to any credible North American message minister. We would proposed to use pre-agreed upon debating rules such as the Oxford Union rules. The debate would be held at such place and time and with a moderator that both parties could mutually agree on. We would also require that, if it was a minister, they have English as their mother tongue. The debate would be recorded on video and a copy given to each party in the debate. | Furthermore, we challenge [[Billy Paul Branham]] or [[Joseph Branham]] to a debate. We also open that challenge to any credible North American message minister. We would proposed to use pre-agreed upon debating rules such as the Oxford Union rules. The debate would be held at such place and time and with a moderator that both parties could mutually agree on. We would also require that, if it was a minister, they have English as their mother tongue. The debate would be recorded on video and a copy given to each party in the debate. |