Jump to content

The Perfect Man: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
By this teaching, William Branham was basically saying he was fully "mature".  
By this teaching, William Branham was basically saying he was fully "mature".  


What should that say of his character then? How then do the apparent "lies" demonstrate Jesus Christ? This puts him on a level entirely different than any other prophet in the Bible. Elijah was just a man. Moses was just a man. They didn't have the Holy Ghost. But William Branham was a god-man (fulfilling Luke 17:30/Malachi 4/Rev 10:7), fully mature.  
What should that say of his character then? How then do the apparent "lies" demonstrate Jesus Christ? This puts him on a level entirely different than any other prophet in the Bible. Elijah was just a man. Moses was just a man. They didn't have the Holy Ghost. But William Branham claimed was a god-man (fulfilling Luke 17:30/Malachi 4/Rev 10:7), fully mature.  


How can we compare him with other reformers (who had partial truth) or old testament prophets?
How can we compare him with other reformers (who had partial truth) or old testament prophets?