Theology: Difference between revisions

Theology (view source)

921 bytes removed , 10 years ago

no edit summary

3,880

edits

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 :''How would God let me tell something wrong, and stand up with my very message. These things are only to indicate a Divine a vindication that '''my theology is right'''. That's exactly right. The Word of the Lord came to the prophets.  <ref>BE.NOT.AFRAID  CHAUTAUQUA.OH 60-0609 </ref>
-=Lazy Theology=
-William Branham's approach to theology could at times be considered "lazy" or perhaps "sloppy".
-He often did not provide any (or inadequate) scriptural backing for his theological positions and seemed to have little or no proper understanding of differing understandings of scripture.
-Some examples of his lazy theology are as follows:
-*[[The Prophet and The Eagle|An eagle in the Bible is a type of a prophet]]
-*His rejection of the concept of [[Eternal Sonship]] based on his personal opinion and not on scripture.
-*His lack of understanding of what the doctrine of [[The Trinity]] actually was about.
-*His teaching on [[Matthew 24:28]]
-*His insistence that [[William Branham's Teachings on Water Baptism| water baptism had to be in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, yet there is no record in the New Testament of anyone every having been baptized that way]].
-*[[King Saul - The Peoples' Choice?]]
 =References=