Vaylism: Difference between revisions

Vaylism (view source)

380 bytes added , 10 years ago

11,158

edits

@@ Line 101: / Line 101: @@
 ==Paul was not a Christian?==
-Lee Vayle would make completely bizarre statements that his followers can't get enough of.  Here is an example:
+While his followers state that Lee Vayle was stating that Paul's teachings were lost in the first century, it certainly appears that he is stating that Paul was not a Christian.  Even if that is what he meant, the statement that Paul's teachings were lost make no sense since we have his teachings clearly outlined in his epistles.  But when you don't agree with Paul, it's easy to say that his teachings were lost as a way to ignore what scripture (and Paul in his epistles) clearly states.
 :''"Now Bro. Vayle you can't tell a book by its cover." I got news for you; you can if the prophet said so! That's 'THUS SAITH THE LORD'! Not some jackass idiot philosopher that pawns himself as an erudite educationist, thereby thinks he's spiritual... spiritual my foot.