Jump to content

Cognitive Dissonance: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
=Definition=
=Definition=
Cognitive dissonance is a term used in modern psychology to describe the feeling of discomfort when simultaneously holding two or more conflicting thoughts: ideas, beliefs, values or emotional reactions.  In a state of dissonance, people may sometimes feel "disequilibrium": frustration, nausea, dread, guilt, anger, embarrassment, anxiety, etc.
Cognitive dissonance is a term used in modern psychology to describe the feeling of discomfort when simultaneously holding two or more conflicting thoughts: ideas, beliefs, values or emotional reactions.  In a state of dissonance, people may sometimes feel "disequilibrium": frustration, nausea, dread, guilt, anger, embarrassment, anxiety, etc.
[[Image:Cognitive-dissonance.jpg|right|thumb|370px|A simple example of '''''cognitive dissonance''''']]


=Cause and Effects=
=Cause and Effects=
Dissonance is created when people are confronted with information that is inconsistent with or opposed to their beliefs. If this uneasiness is not reduced by changing one's belief, the dissonance can be resolved by misperception, rejection or refutation of the information, seeking support from others who share the alternative beliefs, and attempting to persuade others.
Dissonance is created when your brain attempts to process information that is inconsistent with other information that it holds to be true. This can be as simple as the example of the color chart on the right or the much more difficult dissonance that results when information is received that is opposed to a person's fundamental beliefs.


Most people will avoid situations or information sources that give rise to feelings of uneasiness, or dissonance.  They will also attempt to eliminate cognitive dissonance through the process of "dissonance reduction".  Many Message Believers deal with their dissonance with regards to the facts on William Branham's failed prophecies by avoiding websites like this.  Many Message Ministers support this approach by preaching that members of their churches should avoid the internet.
Most people will avoid situations or information sources that give rise to feelings of uneasiness, or dissonance.  If this uneasiness is not reduced by changing one's belief, the dissonance can be resolved by misperception, rejection or refutation of the information, seeking support from others who share the alternative beliefs, and attempting to persuade others.


Cognitive dissonance also leads people to accept any information that affirms their already established opinions, rather than referencing material that contradicts them.  For example, a person who is politically conservative will only read newspapers and watch news commentary that is from conservative news sources. This bias appears to be particularly apparent when faced with deeply held beliefs, i.e., when a person has 'high commitment' to his or her attitudes.  
Cognitive dissonance leads people to accept any information that affirms their already established opinions, rather than referencing material that contradicts them.  For example, a person who is politically conservative will only read newspapers and watch news commentary that is from conservative news sources. This bias appears to be particularly apparent when faced with deeply held beliefs, i.e., when a person has 'high commitment' to his or her attitudes.  
 
The process of attempting to eliminate cognitive dissonance is referred to as '''''dissonance reduction'''''.  Many Message Believers deal with the dissonance created by William Branham's failed prophecies by avoiding websites like this.  A number of Message Ministers have supported this approach by preaching that members of their churches should avoid the internet altogether. 


=Examples=
=Examples=
Line 45: Line 49:
#[[The Vision of the Meetings in South Africa|African Vision]] - To avoid this issue, people will say that William Branham was referring to India, not Africa, even though he specifically mentions Durban, South Africa in the vision.  Or another method of avoiding the implication of this failed vision is to state that well over 300,000 people have heard the tapes in South Africa thereby fulfilling the vision, although this again is an irrelevant rationalization.
#[[The Vision of the Meetings in South Africa|African Vision]] - To avoid this issue, people will say that William Branham was referring to India, not Africa, even though he specifically mentions Durban, South Africa in the vision.  Or another method of avoiding the implication of this failed vision is to state that well over 300,000 people have heard the tapes in South Africa thereby fulfilling the vision, although this again is an irrelevant rationalization.
#[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] - To deal with this failed prophecy, followers of William Branham search out explanations that are rooted in conspiracy theory.
#[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] - To deal with this failed prophecy, followers of William Branham search out explanations that are rooted in conspiracy theory.


:::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance - adapted from Wikipedia]
:::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance - adapted from Wikipedia]