11,154
edits
William Branham's understanding of Jesus Christ: Difference between revisions
William Branham's understanding of Jesus Christ (view source)
Revision as of 23:53, 12 October 2013
, 11 years ago→Some of Branham's followers carry this teaching to its logical conclusion
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
'''''The Spirit left Him, in the Garden of Gethsemane. He had to die, a man.''' Remember, friends, He didn't have to do that. That was God. God anointed that flesh, which was human flesh. And He didn't... If He'd a went up there, as God, He'd have never died that kind of death; can't kill God. But He didn't have to do it.<ref>IT.IS.THE.RISING.OF.THE.SUN_ JEFF.IN V-3 N-12 SUNDAY_ 65-0418M</ref> | '''''The Spirit left Him, in the Garden of Gethsemane. He had to die, a man.''' Remember, friends, He didn't have to do that. That was God. God anointed that flesh, which was human flesh. And He didn't... If He'd a went up there, as God, He'd have never died that kind of death; can't kill God. But He didn't have to do it.<ref>IT.IS.THE.RISING.OF.THE.SUN_ JEFF.IN V-3 N-12 SUNDAY_ 65-0418M</ref> | ||
=Some of Branham's followers carry | =Some of Branham's followers carry his teaching into [[Dynamic Monarchianism|Adotionism]]= | ||
''...'''the church has made the great mistake in making Jesus equal to God''' — which he is in a certain way — but '''he’s not God. He’s not Deity.''' I’m sorry, but he’s not, because God is not in him. No way. What God was in him is not Deity, same as what God is in you is not Deity, concerning Deity Himself, which is Sovereign God and Creator and Maintainer.<ref>Lee Vayle, Godhead: Tape #1500/11-05-2000, Godhead Q&A #4: Tangibility of God</ref> | ''...'''the church has made the great mistake in making Jesus equal to God''' — which he is in a certain way — but '''he’s not God. He’s not Deity.''' I’m sorry, but he’s not, because God is not in him. No way. What God was in him is not Deity, same as what God is in you is not Deity, concerning Deity Himself, which is Sovereign God and Creator and Maintainer.<ref>Lee Vayle, Godhead: Tape #1500/11-05-2000, Godhead Q&A #4: Tangibility of God</ref> | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
'''''Jesus cannot be supreme Deity. He’s not even Deity.''' When you talk of supreme Deity, you are talking of the word in the Greek, which is ‘theos’, which means ‘supreme Deity’. And, if Jesus is the Son of God, then he’s merely the son of supreme Deity. He is not supreme Deity.<ref>Lee Vayle, The Supreme Deity of the Lord Jesus Christ, July 1, 2000</ref> | '''''Jesus cannot be supreme Deity. He’s not even Deity.''' When you talk of supreme Deity, you are talking of the word in the Greek, which is ‘theos’, which means ‘supreme Deity’. And, if Jesus is the Son of God, then he’s merely the son of supreme Deity. He is not supreme Deity.<ref>Lee Vayle, The Supreme Deity of the Lord Jesus Christ, July 1, 2000</ref> | ||
=Other are essentially [[Oneness|modalistic]]= | |||
=References= | =References= | ||
<References/> | <References/> | ||