11,154
edits
William Branham's understanding of Jesus Christ: Difference between revisions
William Branham's understanding of Jesus Christ (view source)
Revision as of 21:29, 12 October 2013
, 11 years ago→Branham's followers carried this teaching to its logical conclusion
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
'' Most people will now revert to oneness doctrine to explain it. '''They will simply say that the man Jesus was God. He's not God, and they are wrong.'''<ref>Brian Kocourek, #45 One Mediator Bewteen, April 4th, 1993</ref> | '' Most people will now revert to oneness doctrine to explain it. '''They will simply say that the man Jesus was God. He's not God, and they are wrong.'''<ref>Brian Kocourek, #45 One Mediator Bewteen, April 4th, 1993</ref> | ||
'''''Jesus cannot be supreme Deity. He’s not even Deity.''' When you talk of supreme Deity, you are talking of the word in the Greek, which is ‘theos’, which means ‘supreme Deity’. And, if Jesus is the Son of God, then he’s merely the son of supreme Deity. He is not supreme Deity.< | '''''Jesus cannot be supreme Deity. He’s not even Deity.''' When you talk of supreme Deity, you are talking of the word in the Greek, which is ‘theos’, which means ‘supreme Deity’. And, if Jesus is the Son of God, then he’s merely the son of supreme Deity. He is not supreme Deity.<ref>Lee Vayle, The Supreme Deity of the Lord Jesus Christ, July 1, 2000</ref> | ||
=References= | =References= | ||
<References/> | <References/> | ||