11,158
edits
The Serpent's Seed: Difference between revisions
→Logic Problems
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
These are some of the strange places that this doctrine leads! | These are some of the strange places that this doctrine leads! | ||
=Eve was an after-thought?= | |||
William Branham frequently said of the woman, “She was not part of the original creation. She was a by-product, designed by Satan, to deceive by.” By taking Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 together and by reading them carefully, we can see that this is an error. God created both male and female, one from the dust of the ground and the other from a rib. Both were part of Gof'd creation, which was said to be very good. | |||
=Was the tree of knowledge a fruit tree or something else?= | |||
:''So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food...<ref>Genesis 3:6 (ESV) | |||
What part about being "good for food" makes eating the fruit of the tree a sexual act? This is probably the clearest sign of a false doctrine that there is in the serpent seed doctrine. | |||
=Cain was of the wicked one?= | =Cain was of the wicked one?= | ||