11,153
edits
Different Stories: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Why Do The Visions Change as they are Retold?= | {{Top of Page}} | ||
William Branham's vision from 1933 changed dramatically over the years. In addition, the stories of his early life seem to have no bearing to what actually happened. | |||
=Why Do The Visions/Stories Change as they are Retold?= | |||
Some people speculate that William Branham had a mental condition that caused him to make up stories that weren't true or change them in significant ways each time he told them. | |||
==Was he dyslexic?== | |||
Dyslexia is characterized by difficulty with learning to read fluently and with accurate comprehension despite normal intelligence. Dyslexia is not associated with the symptoms described above. | |||
==Was William Branham a pathological liar?== | |||
Pseudologia fantastica, mythomania, compulsive lying, or pathological lying are four of several terms applied by psychiatrists to the behavior of habitual or compulsive lying.[1][2] It was first described in the medical literature in 1891 by Anton Delbrueck.[2] Although it is a controversial topic,[2] pathological lying has been defined as "falsification entirely disproportionate to any discernible end in view, may be extensive and very complicated, and may manifest over a period of years or even a lifetime".[1] The individual may be aware they are lying, or '''may believe they are telling the truth, being unaware that they are relating fantasies.''' | |||
==Are they false memories?== | ==Are they false memories?== | ||
False memories, sometimes referred to as confabulation, refer to the recollection of inaccurate details of an event, or recollection of a whole event that never occurred. Studies investigating this memory error have been able to successfully implant memories among participants that never existed, such as being lost in a mall as a child (termed the lost in the mall technique) or spilling a bowl of punch at a wedding reception.<ref name="Loftus">Loftus, E. (1997). Creating false memories. ''Scientific American, 277'', 70–75</ref> In this case, false memories were implanted among participants by their family members who claimed that the event had happened. This evidence demonstrates the possibility of implanting false memories on individuals by leading them to remember such events that never occurred. | False memories, sometimes referred to as confabulation, refer to the recollection of inaccurate details of an event, or recollection of a whole event that never occurred. Studies investigating this memory error have been able to successfully implant memories among participants that never existed, such as being lost in a mall as a child (termed the lost in the mall technique) or spilling a bowl of punch at a wedding reception.<ref name="Loftus">Loftus, E. (1997). Creating false memories. ''Scientific American, 277'', 70–75</ref> In this case, false memories were implanted among participants by their family members who claimed that the event had happened. This evidence demonstrates the possibility of implanting false memories on individuals by leading them to remember such events that never occurred. | ||
This memory error can be particularly worrisome in judicial settings, in which witnesses may have false recollections of a crime after it has happened, especially when told by others that particular things may have happened which did not.<ref name="Johnson">Johnson, M. & Raye, C. (1998). False memories and confabulation. ''Trends in Cognitive Science, 2''(4), 137–145</ref> | This memory error can be particularly worrisome in judicial settings, in which witnesses may have false recollections of a crime after it has happened, especially when told by others that particular things may have happened which did not.<ref name="Johnson">Johnson, M. & Raye, C. (1998). False memories and confabulation. ''Trends in Cognitive Science, 2''(4), 137–145</ref> | ||
*''With an adult,, changing the story often means that the first version was a lie. But with children, it is more likely that the first version was the truth and that later versions are untrue, as the child searches to find something which will satisfy the person asking the questions.'' (Brain, Christine, Advanced Psychology: Applications, Issues and Perspectives) | *''With an adult,, changing the story often means that the first version was a lie. But with children, it is more likely that the first version was the truth and that later versions are untrue, as the child searches to find something which will satisfy the person asking the questions.'' (Brain, Christine, Advanced Psychology: Applications, Issues and Perspectives) | ||
| Line 22: | Line 35: | ||
<References/> | <References/> | ||
{{Portal Navigation}} | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||