Jump to content

Enoch and Noah: Difference between revisions

Line 38: Line 38:
#Enoch
#Enoch


In counting the descendants of Adam to get to Seth, you could not include Cain because he was not in Seth's lineage.  Cain and Seth were brothers (as was Abel who Cain killed).  They were both second from Adam, genealogically speaking.  To attempt to say that Seth was the third from Adam, which is what William Branham is infering should happen if Cain was Adam's son, is contrary to basic genetics and genealogical reckoning.
In counting the descendants of Adam to get to Seth, you could not include Cain because he was not in Seth's lineage.  Cain and Seth were brothers (as was Abel who Cain killed).  They were both second from Adam, genealogically speaking.  To attempt to say that Seth was the third from Adam, which is what William Branham is stating would be the case if Cain was Adam's son, is contrary to basic genetics and genealogical reckoning.


The seventh from Adam through Cain was Lamech:
The seventh from Adam through Cain was Lamech: