Jump to content

Did William Branham Teach Oneness?: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:
:''Sabellius says that Father, Son, and Spirit signify no distinctions in God. Say they are three, and he will scream that you are naming three Gods. Say that in the one essence of God there is a trinity of persons; you will say in one word what Scripture states, and cut short empty talkativeness.<ref> John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Volumes 1 & 2, ed. John T. McNeill, trans. Ford Lewis Battles, The Library of Christian Classics, 125 (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2011).</ref>
:''Sabellius says that Father, Son, and Spirit signify no distinctions in God. Say they are three, and he will scream that you are naming three Gods. Say that in the one essence of God there is a trinity of persons; you will say in one word what Scripture states, and cut short empty talkativeness.<ref> John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Volumes 1 & 2, ed. John T. McNeill, trans. Ford Lewis Battles, The Library of Christian Classics, 125 (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2011).</ref>


==William Branham and Modalism=
=William Branham and Modalism=


William Branham tried to hold himself out as believing something that was between Oneness and the Trinity.  As a result, a significant group of his followers, in particular the followers of [[Vaylism|Lee vayle]], believe that God is two and not one.  This doctrine is referred to in a derogatory manner by some as the doctrine of the "Twinity".
William Branham tried to hold himself out as believing something that was between Oneness and the Trinity.  As a result, a significant group of his followers, in particular the followers of [[Vaylism|Lee vayle]], believe that God is two and not one.  This doctrine is referred to in a derogatory manner by some as the doctrine of the "Twinity".
Line 44: Line 44:
|-
|-
|}
|}


= Unitarianism verses Oneness =
= Unitarianism verses Oneness =