11,153
edits
Eternal Sonship: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(Created page with "An example of William Branham's lazy theology is his approach to the concept of the eternal sonship of Christ. Is there such a thing as eter...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An example of William Branham's [[Lazy Theology|lazy theology]] is his approach to the concept of the eternal sonship of Christ. | An example of William Branham's [[Lazy Theology|lazy theology]] is his approach to the concept of the eternal sonship of Christ. | ||
He ridiculed the idea throughout his ministry as being a Catholic doctrine: | |||
:''Not eternal Sonship, 'cause the words don't go good together. That's Catholic doctrine, but... Eternal, how could it be a Sonship and be eternal? If He's a Son, he'd had to have a beginning of time. Eternal's forever. See? So eternal Sonship, there's no such a word to make that sensible. But it was the Logos that went out of God. And there He was playing out there in space just like a child before the door. I can see Him draw the whole picture in His mind of the Kingdom and what it might be.'' <ref>SHOW.US.THE.FATHER.AND.IT'LL.SATISFY.US_ CONNERSVILLE.IN WEDNESDAY_ 53-0610</ref> | |||
Want to ask you, some of you precious Catholic people who call that the eternal sonship of God. God, eternal sonship of Jesus Christ with God, how can you say such a word? I'm a dummy with a seventh-grade education, but I know better than that. The word "Son" has to have a beginning. So how can He be eternal and be a Son? Eternity has no beginning or end. So He can't be a son, an eternal son, and then have a beginning, 'cause there is no such a thing as a eternal son. A son had a beginning, so he can't be eternal. | |||
You see, He is the eternal God, not the eternal son (Glory.), the Almighty, Jehovah-jireh, Jehovah-rapha made manifest in flesh, "In Him dwelt the Fullness of the Godhead bodily." <ref>THE.REVELATION.OF.JESUS.CHRIST_ JEFF.IN ROJC 9-67 SUNDAY_ 60-1204M </ref> | |||
:''A Son, as the Catholic puts it, "Eternal Son," and all the rest of the churches; the word don't even make sense. See? There cannot be Eternal, and then be a Son, 'cause a Son is something that's "begotten from." And the word Eternal, He cannot be an Eter-... He can be a Son, but He cannot be an Eternal Son. No, sir. It cannot be an Eternal Son. <ref>CHRIST.IS.REVEALED.IN.HIS.OWN.WORD_ JEFF.IN V-4 N-10 SUNDAY_ 65-0822M</ref> | |||
However, while he states that the concept doesn't even make sense, '''he provides no scriptural support''' for his position. | |||
| Line 10: | Line 16: | ||
<ref></ref> | |||
<ref></ref> | |||
<ref></ref> | |||
Is there such a thing as eternal sonship? | Is there such a thing as eternal sonship? | ||