|
|
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | | | |
| <div style="text-align:center;border-bottom:3px solid #B8C7D9"> | | <div style="text-align:center;border-bottom:3px solid #B8C7D9"> |
| <div style="float:left; width:25%;font-weight:bold; background-color:#cedff2; color:#000; padding:.3em 0; border:2px solid #B8C7D9; border-bottom:0; font-size:130%">[[The Cloud]]</div> | | <div style="float:left; width:20%;font-weight:bold; background-color:#cedff2; color:#000; padding:.3em 0; border:2px solid #B8C7D9; border-bottom:0; font-size:130%">[[The Cloud]]</div> |
| <div style="float:left;width:24%;padding:.3em 0;margin:2px 2px 0; background-color:#cedff2">[[Prophecy of the Cloud|The Prophecy]]</div> | | <div style="float:left;width:18%;padding:.3em 0;margin:2px 2px 0; background-color:#cedff2">[[Prophecy of the Cloud|The Prophecy]]</div> |
| <div style="float:left;width:24%;padding:.3em 0;margin:2px 2px 0; background-color:#cedff2">[[Rattlesnake Mesa]]</div> | | <div style="float:left;width:18%;padding:.3em 0;margin:2px 2px 0; background-color:#cedff2">[[Rattlesnake Mesa|The Location]]</div> |
| <div style="float:left;width:24%;padding:.3em 0;margin:2px 2px 0; background-color:#cedff2">[[Seven Seals|The Seven Seals]]</div> | | <div style="float:left;width:18%;padding:.3em 0;margin:2px 2px 0; background-color:#cedff2">[[The Cause of the Cloud|The Cause]]</div> |
| | <div style="float:left;width:18%;padding:.3em 0;margin:2px 2px 0; background-color:#cedff2">[[The Timing of Cloud Events|The Timing]]</div> |
| <div style="width:0;height:0;clear:both;overflow:hidden"></div> | | <div style="width:0;height:0;clear:both;overflow:hidden"></div> |
| </div> | | </div> |
| Line 137: |
Line 138: |
|
| |
|
| When William Branham first attributed facial features to the cloud in the sermon 'It is the Rising of the Sun' (April 18,1965), he was not looking at the original Life Magazine photograp. Rather, he was refering to a duotone (halftone) facsimile of the picture that Pastor Pearry Green had obtained from Shirley Abbott Studios of Beaumont, Texas. It appears that deficiencies in the reproduction process created some patterns of lighter and darker shading not present in the original picture. some of which appeared to suggest two eyes and a nose. <ref> The Cloud Study, compiled by the Midnight Cry, May 2011 </ref> | | When William Branham first attributed facial features to the cloud in the sermon 'It is the Rising of the Sun' (April 18,1965), he was not looking at the original Life Magazine photograp. Rather, he was refering to a duotone (halftone) facsimile of the picture that Pastor Pearry Green had obtained from Shirley Abbott Studios of Beaumont, Texas. It appears that deficiencies in the reproduction process created some patterns of lighter and darker shading not present in the original picture. some of which appeared to suggest two eyes and a nose. <ref> The Cloud Study, compiled by the Midnight Cry, May 2011 </ref> |
|
| |
| =Explanations for the Cloud=
| |
|
| |
| Followers of the message believe that there is a complete supernatural explanation for the Cloud while those outside of the message think that it simply a natural phenomena that had a credible scientific explanation.
| |
|
| |
| ==The Scientific Explanation==
| |
|
| |
| On February 28, 1963, a thrust assisted Thor rocket was launched from pad 75-3-5 at Vandenburg Air Force base in California carrying a Keyhole 4 military surveillance satellite.<ref>http://www.astronautix.com/thisday/febary28.htm</ref> The rocket started to veer off course and was intentionally destroyed<ref>http://www.friends-partners.org/partners/mwade/lvs/tatgenad.htm</ref> at an altitude of 44 kilometers (144,000 feet) at 1:52pm.<ref>McDonald, Dr. James E, Cloud-Ring in the Upper Stratosphere, ''Weatherwise'', June 1963, Page 100</ref>
| |
|
| |
| The cloud was investigated by by Dr. James F. MacDonald in a number of published scientific reports. Dr. MacDonald is most famous for his investigations of UFO's. McDonald was senior physicist at the Institute for Atmospheric Physics and professor in the Department of Meteorology, University of Arizona, Tucson.
| |
|
| |
| Dr. MacDonald never published a final report on the cloud. Why? It is likely that he lost interest in the cloud as he arrived at a likely explanation of the cloud that was not particularly interesting, i.e. the explosion of the rocket. As an individual who criticized the scientific community for ignoring phenomena that defied interpretation by conventional science, it is extremely unlikely that he would have failed to publish a final report on the cloud simply because he could not explain it.
| |
|
| |
| The facts:
| |
|
| |
| #The explosion of the rocket was on the same day as the cloud appeared.
| |
| #The explosion of the rocket was at the same height as the height of the cloud (the height of the explosion was exact while the height of the cloud was estimated).
| |
| #The wind speed recorded by scientists was, according to Dr. Macdonald, "tantalizingly close" to the required wind speed.
| |
| #Windspeeds can vary with distance and therefore, the rocket explanation is the most plausible.
| |
|
| |
| Dr. McDonald reports that the cloud appeared in the Mesosphere, but that clouds cannot form at this height. <ref> http://www.spokenwordchurch.com/themessageresourcelibrary/Articles/Cloud%20Article%20-%20Dr%20McDonalds%20Cloud%20Investigation%20Supplement%201963.pdf </ref> However, '''Dr. McDonald has subsequently been proven wrong''' - visible exhaust clouds can reach into the Mesosphere. <ref>http://www.atoptics.co.uk/highsky/rktr1j.htm </ref> More recently, NASA has been testing wind currents at high altitudes by creating extremely high clouds with chemicals. Some of these appear shapes similar to the February 28, 1963 photograph published in Life Magazine and exist without an “exhaust trail” back to the launch site. <ref>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/03/pictures/120327-nasa-rockets-clouds-wallops-jet-stream-edge-space-science/#/nasa-rocket-launch-strange-clouds-blue_50490_600x450.jpg</ref>
| |
|
| |
| Unlike the 1960s, anyone can now see rocket launches from the Vandenburg Air Force Base in California on Youtube.<ref> http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=SGBuQL-FvGI </ref> Depending on conditions, these launches can be seen from Tucson and beyond, and can leave clouds stretching into the mesosphere that remain illuminated long after sunset. <ref> http://spaceflightnow.com/minotaur/cosmic/launch.html and http://www.atoptics.co.uk/highsky/rktr1j.htm </ref>
| |
|
| |
| Questions have also been raised as to why was the cloud not seen prior to appearing over Flagstaff. However, as the cloud was similar to a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noctilucent_cloud noctilucent cloud], it would not be visible until the sky began to darken at sunset. Dr. MacDonald made no mention of the noctilucent cloud phenomena in his report.
| |
|
| |
| In March 2012, NASA launched five rockets off the east coast of the USA to create some of these clouds. These clouds formed rings that look like the May 1963 Life magazine photo. <ref>http://www.gizmag.com/nasa-tracer-rockets-form-ringed-clouds-at-the-edge-of-space/21972/pictures#12</ref>
| |
|
| |
| Questions have also been raised about a second cloud accompanying the cloud. While this does present an issue for the Thor rocket explanation (although not insurmountable), it also presents a problem for those vying for a supernatural explanation. Were there 2 sets of angels? Why didn't William Branham mention the second cloud if he was standing right underneath it?
| |
|
| |
| ==The Supernatural Explanation==
| |
| Those who judge William Branham to be a prophet will spiritualize these discrepancies, rather than admitting that he made an error. Some of these spiritual interpretations include:
| |
| #The southern tip of the cloud was 10 miles north of Flagstaff when the picture in Life magazine was taken.<ref> http://www.spokenwordchurch.com/themessageresourcelibrary/Articles/Cloud%20Article%20-%20Dr%20McDonalds%20Cloud%20Investigation%20Supplement%201963.pdf </ref> 10 miles north of Flagstaff there is a mountain called “Sunset Crater” that is a cone-shaped volcano without a peak. <ref> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunset_Crater </ref>
| |
| #Junior Jackson told William Branham a dream in 1962 <ref> Reproach for the Cause of the Word, 12-23-62</ref> of William Branham taking the top off of a pyramid mountain and exposing white rock. William Branham often relays this dream when speaking about the Angels coming to meet him. Sunset Peak, which looks like a pyramid from the east, is located on the east ridge of the Galiuro Mountains in the Coronado National Forest.
| |
| #In the book of Daniel, the Angel Gabriel was caught for 21 days fighting with the Prince of Persia before he appeared to Daniel. Perhaps these angels were caught for a few days between Flagstaff and Sunset.
| |
| #In 1955, William Branham said that based on his personal vision of Jesus Christ, that Hofmann’s head of “Christ at thirty-three” was the most accurate painting of Jesus that he had ever seen. <ref> In the sermon “How the Angel Came to Me” (January 17, 1955)</ref> Nelson Rockerfeller, the son of the man who had purchased this painting of Jesus from Hofmann, appears on the front cover of the May 1963 Life Magazine. #William Branham discovered that the inverse of this picture fits into the circle of the cloud <ref>“Rising of the Sun” (April 18, 1965)</ref> like white wig over a judge. Behind the picture of the cloud in the May issue of Life Magazine was a picture of a moon rainbow. When held to the light, it is reminiscent of Revelation 10:1 which says, And I saw another mighty angel come down from heaven, clothed with a cloud: and a rainbow was upon his head”
| |
|
| |
| ==Problems with the Spiritual Interpretation==
| |
|
| |
| Questions that must be asked if the cloud is seen to be supernatural in origin:
| |
|
| |
| #If the cloud is related to the events which occurred at [[Rattlesnake Mesa]], why didn't the cloud appear there?
| |
| #Why did William Branham state that the cloud was directly above him when it appeared 8 days earlier 200 miles away?
| |
| #William Branham stated that the Cloud was formed as the angels left him. If that is the case, why did the Cloud appear 8 days prior to the visitation of the angels.
| |
| #Why didn't the cloud appear at the time that William Branham said that his [[Prophecy of the Cloud|vision]] was fulfilled?
| |
| #Why does he state that the magazine refers to the same place that he was hunting when it clearly does not?
| |
| #Why does he again state that he was under the cloud, when he wasn't anywhere close to it? Some message ministers have stated that the Cloud that William Branham saw was in another dimension but he specifically states that the Cloud that was formed when the angels left him and that science took a picture of that cloud?
| |
| #Why did he say absolutely nothing about the Cloud until he was shown a picture of it in Life magazine?
| |
| #People have indicated the William Branham stated privately that the angels had been waiting for him a week before he arrived. There are a number of problems with this explanation:
| |
| ##The statement occurs nowhere in the tapes, so cannot be verified. Is this something that a message believer simply made up to explain the time problem?
| |
| ##William Branham stated that the Cloud was formed when the angels left. This does not agree with the theory that the Cloud was formed when they arrived.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| {{col-begin}}
| |
| {{col-break}}
| |
|
| |
|
| ==References== | | ==References== |
| Line 197: |
Line 143: |
| <references/> | | <references/> |
| </div> | | </div> |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| {{Portal Navigation}} | | {{Portal Navigation}} |
| |- | | |- |
| |} | | |} |