Jump to content

Rise of a Woman in America: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Top of Page}}
{{Top of Page}}
[[Image:MaryFlag.jpg||thumb|250px|right]]
{{1933 Visions}}
[[Image:Kamala Harris.jpeg|thumb|right|250px|Kamala Harris being sworn in as the Vice President of the United States]]
William Branham claimed he saw a series of <strike>seven</strike> ten prophetic visions in June 1933, which he also claimed to write down in an old book.  In the seventh vision, a woman rose to great power in America.  William Branham was not sure whether the "Woman" in this vision was a physical woman, or a religious power such as the Catholic Church.
William Branham claimed he saw a series of <strike>seven</strike> ten prophetic visions in June 1933, which he also claimed to write down in an old book.  In the seventh vision, a woman rose to great power in America.  William Branham was not sure whether the "Woman" in this vision was a physical woman, or a religious power such as the Catholic Church.


William Branham said the following in 1958:
In 1955, William Branham told of a prophecy he made:
 
:''And I said, "Remember, in that day, before the end time comes, before the end time comes, that a woman... Now, you all keep this wrote down. There'll be a great powerful woman raise up, either be President, or dictator, or some great powerful woman in this United States. And she'll sink under the influence of women. Now, you remember; that's THUS SAITH THE LORD.''


''“Before the end time comes, there’ll be a woman, that’ll be a great ruler in this nation. '''She will either be president or something on that order, some great woman.''' ...That was in 1932, or something like that.<ref>William Branham, 55-0501E - The Faith That Was Once Delivered To The Saints, para. 17</ref><br>
=Did William Branham prophesy the election of Kamala Harris?=
=Did William Branham prophesy the election of Kamala Harris?=
[[Image:Kamala Harris.jpeg|thumb|right|250px|Kamala Harris being sworn in as the Vice President of the United States]]
[[Image:Pope Francis in Purple.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Pope Francis in his purple robe]]
[[Image:Pope Francis in Purple.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Pope Francis in his purple robe]]
The first 10 minutes of '''Episode 65 of the Off The Shelf podcast''' addresses the Kamala Harris prophecy - [http://offtheshelf.life/podcast/episode-65-the-seven-thunders-part-2/ click here to listen]
Many message followers are pointing to a statement by William Branham from 1960:
Many message followers are pointing to a statement by William Branham from 1960:


Line 22: Line 24:
==Classifying William Branham's prophecies==
==Classifying William Branham's prophecies==


Branham's "prophecies" can be classified into three categories:
William Branham made a number of predictions and prophecies.  Based on our research, William Branham's "prophecies" can be classified into three categories:
#Demonstrably False,  
#Those that are clearly False,
#So vague as to be largely unfalsifiable,or
#Those that are so vague that they will almost certainly be fulfilled in some way, and
#Based on common scientific knowledge and/or common sense.  
#Prophecies that are based on scripture, common scientific knowledge and/or common sense.
 
In 1955, William Branham stated that a woman would become a great ruler in the US. She would either be president or something on that order.
 
In 1956, he stated that a woman would be president before the US was annihilated.  He stated that the prophecy was written down.  He also said on various occasions that it might be the Catholic church.  In 1963, he stated it was not actually a woman but a church.
 
He mentioned this prophecy approximately 14 times in the 10 years prior to his death in 1965.
 
In looking at this prophecy, we need to ask a couple of questions.
 
===Was this prophecy unique?===


This is true even if you allow multiple variations of the same prophecy over time, which is in itself problematic. One would think that a would-be prophet who often mentioned his "prophecies" after their supposed fulfillment would at least have some wins to debate, but strangely enough, this isn't the case. In the matter of the woman coming to power, it is a combination of Category 2 and 3.
Was William Branham the first person to prophecy that a woman would be president? Or a vice president?


One could use the exact same prophecy to claim fulfillment of heavy Catholic influence or an actual woman in power, and predicting that a woman will someday be President of the United States carries with it the same inevitability as a massive earthquake along the San Andreas fault line, or cars that will oneday drive themselves. As they say, doesn't take a prophet.
According to an article in The Atlantic dated November 1, 2016, predictions of a women president (or presidentess) started even before women had the vote. A 1910 headline in the ''Meade County News'', a Kansas newspaper stated:


The x-factor here is the purple dress. Without it, this is just another vague non-prophecy to go along with dozens of others.  The fact that Kamala Harris wore a purple dress at inauguration– along with several other women, to symbolize an era of cooperation between Republicans (red) and Democrats (blue), Imight add–seems to carry some specificity, an ingredient sorely lacking most of Branham's prophecies/predictions.
:'''''Mere Man Faces Danger of a Woman Being President of the United States'''''


There are a couple of problems with this. The first is that Branham's followers are so accustomed to sloppy, vague non-prophecies that one element of a vision that seems to align perfectly is cause for celebration and confidence. That in itself is telling. The bible is very clear on the requirements for prophecy to take seriously and we are still waiting for a msg minister to provide a single example that meets the criteria.
A newspaper advertisement in 1892 predicted that by 1992, a 100 years later, perhaps the first woman would be inaugurated as president. And in 1928, a Los Angeles Times article humorously predicted that by the year 1975, ''"there will doubtless be a lady President of the Uniteds Sates with a lady Cabinet and a lady Senate."''


Speaking of the purple dress, I think there is ample evidence to support that Branham was using the purple of royalty to symbolize the "purple curtain" (Roman Catholic Church), though in a debate I would happily concede the point as the validity of the prophecy hardly rests on that one detail. Branham himself repeatedly stressed how every single detail of a vision must be just exactly right.
When William Branham predicted that a woman would be president of the United States at some unknown time in the future, he was not the first to make such a prediction.


Even more importantly, even if every single detail of this vision were undeniably perfect, (it's not), that wouldn't negate the insurmountable case against him as a false prophet otherwise. IfKamala Harris's term comes and goes with little drama, expectmsg folks to simply re-assign this "prophecy" to the next woman candidate, just as they did with Hillary Clinton. If she happens to not wear purple, well, I expect they'll leave that detail out. Afterall, there are multiple versions of this prophecy/prediction to pick from. And if Joe Biden is in some way incapacitated or dies and Harris actually becomes president? Fasten your seatbelts, the noise from the msg corner will become even louder.
After women were given the vote in the US. simple common sense would tell you that the prediction would come true at some time in the future, however distant that might be.
 
===Was this prophecy vague?===
 
Is this a prophecy that is sufficiently vague that it will almost certainly be fulfilled? 
 
The details of this prophecy seem intentionally ambiguous.  The woman is a president or a vice president or a dictator or the Catholic church or any other thing that might be symbolically portrayed as a powerful woman. 
 
One could use the exact same prophecy to claim fulfillment of heavy Catholic influence or an actual woman in power. Predicting that a woman will someday be President of the United States carries with it the same inevitability as a massive earthquake along the San Andreas fault line, or cars that will one day drive themselves. That doesn't take a prophet and William Branham was not the first to predict any of these things.
 
Women obtained the legal right to vote nationally in the US in 1920.  William Branham stated he received this prophecy in 1933.  Given the way history was moving it was not hard to believe in 1933 that a woman would eventually be president or vice president.  If the prophecies were actually made in 1933… and there is some doubt about that… then to see a woman as vice president some 87 years later is not an astounding prophecy.
 
As a result, it is reasonable to conclude that this prophecy qualifies as being sufficiently fuzzy as to almost certainly be fulfilled at some time in the future.
 
===Is this a prophecy which William Branham takes from scripture?===
 
What about the fact that Kamala Harris was wearing purple?  Isn’t this a clear indication of a non-vague prophecy?
 
In a sermon which on December 7, 1960, William Branham quotes revelation 17:4… “And the woman was arrayed in purple…” and then he says “The beast was scarlet, but the woman was arrayed in purple.”
 
So, if he thought that the woman in his vision was the Catholic church and the Bible says she was wearing purple, then it is not surprising for William Branham to say that in his vision the woman was wearing purple.  What is surprising is that he never referred to the powerful woman wearing purple at any time prior to 1960.  It was only later, after he quoted Revelation 17:4 in a sermon, that he mentions her wearing purple.
 
This is an example of the third category of prophecies that William Branham made.  It is a prophecy which he takes from scripture.
 
I think it is important to note that message followers are desperate to find a valid prophecy that William Branham made.  Our highest traffic in the past 5 years was in early November 2016 when Hillary Clinton vied against Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.
 
Psychologists have proved that where prophecies made by revered religious leaders fail, their followers become more fervent in their beliefs and will go on to believe things that normal people shake their heads at. 
 
This is very hard for people outside the message to understand but this is what is happening in the message. The followers of William Branham are sadly becoming more and more like a cult.
 
===What if this was a valid prophecy?===
 
Say that this is a valid prophecy, does it negate the others prophecies that clearly failed?
 
God tells us in Deuteronomy 18:20-22 that
 
:''"A prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, is to be put to death.”  You may say to yourselves, “How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the Lord?”  '''If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the Lord does not take place or come true''', that is a message the Lord has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed.<ref>The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), Dt 18:20-22</ref>
 
'''This is a “one strike and you’re out test”''' which William Branham applied to himself. If we can find one failed prophecy, we don’t have to look any farther.
 
There are a number of visions which William Branham made which failed.  '''The municipal bridge vision failed, as did the Brown Bear vision, and the vision of the meetings in South Africa.'''  As a result, we can state without hesitation that you should not pay attention to William Branham.
 
The important question is this - does Kamala Harris being elected as vice president AND wearing purple at her inauguration mean that William Branham is everything that message followers say he is? 
 
The answer is '''No''', it does not.
 
We are still left with the myriad failed visions and after the fact prophecies.  We are faced with sermons that William Branham says he received from God but were clearly plagiarized.  We are confronted with an astounding lack of credibility.  None of that has changed.
 
We are certainly willing to admit that William Branham stated in a 87 year old prophecy that a woman might be vice president.  He got it right.  But that is not an astounding prophecy.  That she would wear purple is a bit better but it appears he was merely trying to make reference to Revelation 17:4.
 
We could prophecy today that a woman in the future will be president and that this future president will wear scarlet at some time. That prophecy will come true… at some time in the future.  But that does not make the writer of this article a prophet.  We simply understand that some things are inevitable.
 
However, message followers will point to this and will believe the message more fervently, just as the psychologists predicted.  That is sad but not something that can be discussed rationally with message followers.
 
Message preachers will continue to fill their congregations with fear…  Something that the Bible says is the opposite of a real relationship with God.  Again, this is regretful.  We understand from Romans 8:15 that we did not receive a spirit that makes us fear. NO!  We received God’s Spirit when he adopted us as his own children. Now we call him, “Abba, Father.” For his Spirit joins with our spirit to affirm that we are God’s children.
 
That is what being a Christ follower is about
 
Message followers now believe that the destruction of the United States will happen shortly.  As a result, some message followers will sell their houses and spend their life savings, just as happened [[1977|prior to 1977]].


===The Multiple Versions of the Prophecy===
===The Multiple Versions of the Prophecy===


William Branham said that the prophecy was written down, so each retelling of it should have been consistent.  However, William Branham's statement that a woman would rise to the American Presidency later changed to women voting in a Catholic president.  The great woman became beautiful and cruel, and William Branham claimed this was fulfilled with the election of JFK.  Later, the woman was dressed in purple.  In one sermon this was to be followed immediately by the destruction of America.  William Branham omitted JFK from the fulfillment of this prophecy after the President was assassinated in November 1963.
William Branham said that the prophecy was written down, so each retelling of it should have been consistent.  However, William Branham's statement that a woman would rise to the American Presidency later changed to women voting in a Catholic president.  The great woman became beautiful and cruel, and William Branham claimed this was fulfilled with the election of JFK.  Later, the woman was dressed in purple.  In one sermon this was to be followed immediately by the destruction of America.  William Branham omitted JFK from the fulfillment of this prophecy after the President was assassinated in November 1963.
[[Image:Rosie the Riveter.jpg||thumb|right|Rosie the Riviter|250px]]
[[Image:Rosie the Riveter.jpg|right|Rosie the Riviter|250px]]


Here is a recap of what William Branham said (see full quotes at the bottom of this page):
Here is a recap of what William Branham said (see full quotes at the bottom of this page):
*1955: A woman will rise to power in America as a president.
*1955: A woman will rise to power in America as a president.
*1956: A woman will be president
*1956: A woman will be president before the US is annihilated.
*1957: A great powerful woman will take over the whole nation.
*1957: A great powerful woman will take over the whole nation.
*1958:  
*1958:  
**A woman would rule this nation
**A woman would rule this nation.
**A great woman will rise up, and be President or something  
**A great woman will rise up, and be President or something  
**There’ll be a great, powerful woman raise up, either be President, or dictator, or some great powerful woman in this United States.
**There’ll be a great, powerful woman raise up, either be President, or dictator, or some great powerful woman in this United States.
*1960:  
*1960:  
**There will be a woman rule before the end time. She’ll either be President, Vice President, or it’ll be the Catholic Church as a woman.
**Women will vote in the wrong person (Kennedy), and a great woman beautiful and great would rise in the U.S. (perhaps the Catholic Church).  
**Women will vote in the wrong person (Kennedy), and a great woman beautiful and great would rise in the U.S. (perhaps the Catholic Church).  
**There will be a woman rule before the end time. She’ll either be President, Vice President, or it’ll be the Catholic Church as a woman.
**The coming of the control of a woman in the United States to take over, maybe a church to take over to rule.
**A great woman, beautiful and cruel, will stand up in the United States as a president (perhaps the Catholic church)
**Women would elect the wrong person. Then a great woman, a church, a power or something, would take over this United States, to rule. Then I seen it just like ashes,
**The vision showed Kennedy being elected. A great woman, beautiful and cruel, rising in the USA (perhaps the Catholic Church) caused by the women’s voteFollowed immediately by the destruction of America.
**A great woman wold stand up in the United States, beautiful, but cruel in heart, perhaps the Catholic church.  And women being permitted to vote would help elect the wrong person... And that’s what they done. Exactly.
*1961
**Women will be permitted to vote, and they’ll elect the wrong person (which happened in 1960) During that time, there’ll be a great woman rise up in the United States, she’ll be beautifully dressed (perhaps the Catholic church) that’ll take rulership over the power, overpower the others in the United States. She’ll be beautiful to look at, but she’ll be cruel-hearted as she can beThen the United States just blowed to pieces.
**The women’s vote will elect the wrong man, causing a great, beautiful, and cruel woman to rise to power (a church)
**A vision of the great powerful woman
**Voting women would elect the wrong man (Kennedy)A great woman would rise in the US dressed in purple clothes (perhaps a ruler or the Catholic Church).   
*1961:
*1964: A great queen rising in the US, beautiful and wicked.   
**A powerful woman will stand up to the United States. She’s on her road now.  And she took over.  And then I seen the United States was blown up.
*Church Age Book: Voting is connected with the decline in morals and the rise of a beautiful, cruel woman in America, possibly the Catholic Church.   
**I seen a great woman rise up, beautiful to look at, but a cruel wicked heart. And that will be a church. And she’s on her road now.
**I saw a great woman stand up, beautiful-looking, dressed in real highly royal-like purple.  She was a great ruler in the United States; perhaps the Catholic church.  I don’t know it’ll be the Catholic church. I don’t know. I can’t say. Only thing I seen, I seen the woman, that was all.
*1963: They would permit women to vote, and, in doing so, they would elect the wrong PresidentAnd in this would be a woman stand up that would govern the United States; not actually a woman, but a church.   
*1964: a woman ruling this nation, which, perhaps, is the churchAnd then the end come.
*Church Age Book: There arose up in America a most beautiful, but cruel woman. She held the people in her complete power.  I believed that this was the rise of the Roman Catholic Church, though I knew it could possibly be a vision of some woman rising in great power in America due to a popular vote by women.   


William Branham also mentions that Leo Mercer would be revising this prophecy, when he said, ''"By the way, Mr. Mercier and many of them are going to take some of these old prophecies, and dig them out, and revise them a little, or bring them up to date, and put them in papers.'' <ref>CONDEMNATION.BY.REPRESENTATION_  JEFF.IN  V-2 N-13  SUNDAY_  60-1113</ref>
William Branham also mentions that Leo Mercer would be revising this prophecy, when he said, ''"By the way, Mr. Mercier and many of them are going to take some of these old prophecies, and dig them out, and revise them a little, or bring them up to date, and put them in papers.'' <ref>CONDEMNATION.BY.REPRESENTATION_  JEFF.IN  V-2 N-13  SUNDAY_  60-1113</ref>
Line 90: Line 165:
=Quotes of William Branham=
=Quotes of William Branham=


''Wrote twenty-three years ago. “Before the end time comes, there’ll be a woman, that’ll be a great ruler in this nation. She will either be president or something on that order, some great woman. And at that time, automobiles, just before the coming of the Lord, will be in the shape of an egg.” Now, remember that; keep it in mind. See? That was in 1932, or something like that. And look how they’re shaping down every year, right to it. We’re nearer the end time; we are.<ref>William Branham, 55-0501E - The Faith That Was Once Delivered To The Saints, para. 17</ref>
''Wrote twenty-three years ago. “Before the end time comes, there’ll be a woman, that’ll be a great ruler in this nation. '''She will either be president or something on that order, some great woman.''' And at that time, automobiles, just before the coming of the Lord, will be in the shape of an egg.” Now, remember that; keep it in mind. See? That was in 1932, or something like that.<ref>William Branham, 55-0501E - The Faith That Was Once Delivered To The Saints, para. 17</ref>


''But just remember this. I predict this: that '''a woman will be president before we’re annihilated.''' That’s right. I said that in 1933 by a vision.<ref>William Branham, 56-0428 - God's Covenant With Abraham, para. 44</ref>
''But just remember this. I predict this: that '''a woman will be president before we’re annihilated.''' That’s right. I said that in 1933 by a vision.<ref>William Branham, 56-0428 - God's Covenant With Abraham, para. 44</ref>


''Women are taking over. Course, that’s just the trend and the prophecy of the day, that this nation is a woman’s nation. It’ll be run by a woman. And remember, thir-…1933, I saw that come in a vision, '''a great powerful woman will take over the whole nation''', some day, that’s exactly right, before the end time, ’fore total annihilation.<ref>William Branham, 57-0602 - Life, para. 33</ref>
''Women are taking over. Course, that’s just the trend and the prophecy of the day, that this nation is a woman’s nation. It’ll be run by a woman. And remember, thir-… 1933, I saw that come in a vision, '''a great powerful woman will take over the whole nation''', some day, that’s exactly right, before the end time, ’fore total annihilation.<ref>William Branham, 57-0602 - Life, para. 33</ref>


''And you remember, '''I’ve already predicted in 1933, a woman would rule this nation before the chaos, by the annihilation.''' See her face on the money; she’s everything; she’s a goddess; she’s… Hollywood’s done it. The reason that takes place, is because you stayed home on Wednesday night from the prayer meeting to watch some old dirty play of “We Love Sucy,” or something like that.<ref>William Branham, 58-0512 - Life, para. 31</ref>
''And you remember, '''I’ve already predicted in 1933, a woman would rule this nation before the chaos, by the annihilation.''' See her face on the money; she’s everything; she’s a goddess; she’s… Hollywood’s done it. The reason that takes place, is because you stayed home on Wednesday night from the prayer meeting to watch some old dirty play of “We Love Sucy,” or something like that.<ref>William Branham, 58-0512 - Life, para. 31</ref>
Line 110: Line 185:
''Look at the prophecy the Lord give me in ’33, how it would happen, “They’d permit women to vote. In voting, they’d elect the wrong person.” Seven things was give, and five of them has already happened. '''The next thing was a great woman, a church, a power or something, would take over this United States, to rule.''' Then I seen it just like ashes, laying, where it come to the end. It was the end time.<ref>William Branham, 60-1204M - The Revelation Of Jesus Christ, para. 390</ref>
''Look at the prophecy the Lord give me in ’33, how it would happen, “They’d permit women to vote. In voting, they’d elect the wrong person.” Seven things was give, and five of them has already happened. '''The next thing was a great woman, a church, a power or something, would take over this United States, to rule.''' Then I seen it just like ashes, laying, where it come to the end. It was the end time.<ref>William Branham, 60-1204M - The Revelation Of Jesus Christ, para. 390</ref>


''Now, and it said in there, “At that time, there’d be a great woman stand up in the United States.” And she was dressed and beautiful, but she was cruel in heart. And I got in parenthesis on the vision, even yellow paper, said, “perhaps the Catholic church.” And the women being permitted to vote would help elect the wrong person for this nation. And that’s what they done. Exactly. Now, said, “That would be the beginning.”<ref>William Branham, 60-1205 - The Ephesian Church Age, para. 48</ref>
''Now, and it said in there, “At that time, there’d be '''a great woman stand up in the United States.” And she was dressed and beautiful, but she was cruel in heart.''' And I got in parenthesis on the vision, even '''yellow paper, said, “perhaps the Catholic church.'''” And the women being permitted to vote would help elect the wrong person for this nation. And that’s what they done. Exactly. Now, said, “That would be the beginning.”<ref>William Branham, 60-1205 - The Ephesian Church Age, para. 48</ref>
 
''Now, just one minute, let’s stop here just a second, by the way. And let’s—us turn now to Revelation, 17th chapter, just a minute. Just turned right straight to it... Now, the seven heads are the seven “mountains” on which the city sets. And this woman is the city, we know. '''And the woman was arrayed in purple…'''  “The woman.” '''The beast was scarlet, but the woman was arrayed in purple.'''<ref>William Branham, 60-1207 - The Pergamean Church Age, para. 164, 176-177</ref>


''Now, so then I said, “There will be in that time, during that time the women will be permitted to vote, and they’ll elect the wrong person.” They did it on this last election. That’s right. “Which will start the stronghold. '''During that time it’ll come to pass that—that there’ll be a great woman rise up in the United States, she’ll be beautifully dressed,” and I got in parenthesis: “(perhaps the Catholic church).” See? “That’ll take rulership over the power, overpower the others in the United States. She’ll be beautiful to look at, but she’ll be cruel-hearted as she can be.”'''  I said, “Then I looked again, and I saw the United States just blowed to pieces. There wasn’t nothing left on it.” 200 And I predicted then. “Now this, that was THUS SAITH THE LORD.”<ref>William Branham, 60-1208 - The Thyatirean Church Age, para. 198</ref>
''Now, so then I said, “There will be in that time, during that time the women will be permitted to vote, and they’ll elect the wrong person.” They did it on this last election. That’s right. “Which will start the stronghold. '''During that time it’ll come to pass that—that there’ll be a great woman rise up in the United States, she’ll be beautifully dressed,” and I got in parenthesis: “(perhaps the Catholic church).” See? “That’ll take rulership over the power, overpower the others in the United States. She’ll be beautiful to look at, but she’ll be cruel-hearted as she can be.”'''  I said, “Then I looked again, and I saw the United States just blowed to pieces. There wasn’t nothing left on it.” 200 And I predicted then. “Now this, that was THUS SAITH THE LORD.”<ref>William Branham, 60-1208 - The Thyatirean Church Age, para. 198</ref>
Line 127: Line 204:


''God showed me that women began to be out of their place with the granting of the vote… '''Then in the sixth vision there arose up in America a most beautiful, but cruel woman. She held the people in her complete power.''' I believed that this was the rise of the Roman Catholic Church, though I knew it could possibly be a vision of some woman rising in great power in America due to a popular vote by women. <ref>William Branham, Church Age Book, Chapter 9</ref>
''God showed me that women began to be out of their place with the granting of the vote… '''Then in the sixth vision there arose up in America a most beautiful, but cruel woman. She held the people in her complete power.''' I believed that this was the rise of the Roman Catholic Church, though I knew it could possibly be a vision of some woman rising in great power in America due to a popular vote by women. <ref>William Branham, Church Age Book, Chapter 9</ref>