Jump to content

Rise of a Woman in America: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 84: Line 84:
God tells us in Deuteronomy 18:20-22 that  
God tells us in Deuteronomy 18:20-22 that  


:''"A prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, is to be put to death.”  You may say to yourselves, “How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the Lord?”  If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the Lord does not take place or come true, that is a message the Lord has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed.<ref>The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), Dt 18:20-22</ref>
:''"A prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, is to be put to death.”  You may say to yourselves, “How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the Lord?”  '''If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the Lord does not take place or come true''', that is a message the Lord has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed.<ref>The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), Dt 18:20-22</ref>


This is a “one strike and you’re out test” which William Branham applied to himself.  If we can find one failed prophecy, we don’t have to look any farther.
'''This is a “one strike and you’re out test”''' which William Branham applied to himself.  If we can find one failed prophecy, we don’t have to look any farther.


There are a number of visions which William Branham made which failed.  The municipal bridge vision failed, as did the Brown Bear vision, and the vision of the meetings in South Africa.  As a result, we can state without hesitation that you should not pay attention to William Branham.
There are a number of visions which William Branham made which failed.  '''The municipal bridge vision failed, as did the Brown Bear vision, and the vision of the meetings in South Africa.''' As a result, we can state without hesitation that you should not pay attention to William Branham.


The important question is this - does Kamala Harris being elected as vice president AND wearing purple at her inauguration mean that William Branham is everything that message followers say he is?   
The important question is this - does Kamala Harris being elected as vice president AND wearing purple at her inauguration mean that William Branham is everything that message followers say he is?   


The answer is No, it does not.
The answer is '''No''', it does not.


We are still left with the myriad failed visions and after the fact prophecies.  We are faced with sermons that William Branham says he received from God but were clearly plagiarized.  We are confronted with an astounding lack of credibility.  None of that has changed.
We are still left with the myriad failed visions and after the fact prophecies.  We are faced with sermons that William Branham says he received from God but were clearly plagiarized.  We are confronted with an astounding lack of credibility.  None of that has changed.
Line 125: Line 125:
**Women will vote in the wrong person (Kennedy), and a great woman beautiful and great would rise in the U.S. (perhaps the Catholic Church).  
**Women will vote in the wrong person (Kennedy), and a great woman beautiful and great would rise in the U.S. (perhaps the Catholic Church).  
**The coming of the control of a woman in the United States to take over, maybe a church to take over to rule.
**The coming of the control of a woman in the United States to take over, maybe a church to take over to rule.
**Women would elect the wrong person.n. Then a great woman, a church, a power or something, would take over this United States, to rule. Then I seen it just like ashes,
**Women would elect the wrong person. Then a great woman, a church, a power or something, would take over this United States, to rule. Then I seen it just like ashes,
**A great woman wold stand up in the United States, beautiful, but cruel in heart, perhaps the Catholic church.  And women being permitted to vote would help elect the wrong person... And that’s what they done. Exactly.
**A great woman wold stand up in the United States, beautiful, but cruel in heart, perhaps the Catholic church.  And women being permitted to vote would help elect the wrong person... And that’s what they done. Exactly.
**Women will be permitted to vote, and they’ll elect the wrong person (which happened in 1960)  During that time, there’ll be a great woman rise up in the United States, she’ll be beautifully dressed (perhaps the Catholic church) that’ll take rulership over the power, overpower the others in the United States. She’ll be beautiful to look at, but she’ll be cruel-hearted as she can be.  Then the United States just blowed to pieces.  
**Women will be permitted to vote, and they’ll elect the wrong person (which happened in 1960)  During that time, there’ll be a great woman rise up in the United States, she’ll be beautifully dressed (perhaps the Catholic church) that’ll take rulership over the power, overpower the others in the United States. She’ll be beautiful to look at, but she’ll be cruel-hearted as she can be.  Then the United States just blowed to pieces.