Rick Joyner: Difference between revisions

Line 17:

:''“I just wanted you to see him here,” the Lord explained “and to understand the position he has with Me. There is much for you to understand about him. He was a messenger to My last-day church, but the church could not hear him for reasons that you will understand in due time. He did fall into discouragement and delusion for a time, and his message was distorted. It must be recovered, as well as the parts that I have given to others which were also distorted.”''

~~<table class="MainPageBG" style="width:800px;height:135;border:1px solid #E8B399;background-color:#F0DCC8;vertical-align:top">~~

~~<tr><td width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top;background-color:#F0DCC8" align="center">~~

'''EDITOR'S NOTE'''<br><font size='-1'>Rev. Joyner identifies William Branham as a prophet, but does not follow his teachings. Using this example, someone could identify Rev. Joyner as a prophet, but would be justified in refusing to follow his teachings. Taking this argument further, the Old Testament Jews would be justified in protesting Moses' ministry, and the New Testament Christians would be justified in abandoning Jesus' teachings. The editor of this website does not believe that there is a Biblical principal for this logic.</font>

~~</td></tr>~~

~~</table>~~

|-

|}