Jump to content

A Scriptural Challenge to Followers of William Branham: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 35: Line 35:
=='''Challenge #2 - Please provide a scriptural defence!'''==
=='''Challenge #2 - Please provide a scriptural defence!'''==


'''We challenge all message ministers and message believers to make a defense of William Branham and his message''' to all former  and current message believers that have questions.  We have presented [[List of Issues with the Message|detailed reasons why the message is false]] each of which constitutes asking for a "reason" for the hope that is in you.   
'''We challenge all message ministers and message believers to make a defense of William Branham and his message''' to all former  and current message believers that have questions, as required by 1 Peter 3:15.  We have presented [[List of Issues with the Message|detailed reasons why the message is false]] each of which constitutes asking for a "reason" for the hope that is in you.   


'''Click [[List of Issues with the Message|here to see a list of all of our unanswered questions]].'''
'''Click [[List of Issues with the Message|here to see a list of all of our unanswered questions]].'''
Line 41: Line 41:
=='''Challenge #3 - A Challenge To A Debate'''==
=='''Challenge #3 - A Challenge To A Debate'''==


Further the challenges above, we challenge [[Billy Paul Branham]] or [[Joseph Branham]] to a debate.  We also open that challenge to any credible North American message minister.  We would proposed to use pre-agreed upon debating rules such as the Oxford Union rules.  The debate would be held at such place and time and with a moderator that both parties could mutually agree on.  We would also require that, if it was a minister, they have English as their mother tongue.  The debate would be recorded on video and a copy given to each party in the debate.
Further the challenges above, we challenge [[Billy Paul Branham]] or [[Joseph Branham]] to a debate.  We also open that challenge to any credible North American message minister (one with a congregation in excess of 200 people).  We would proposed to use pre-agreed upon debating rules such as the Oxford Union rules.  The debate would be held at such place and time and with a moderator that both parties could mutually agree on (a neutral location).  We would also require that, if it was a minister, they have English as their mother tongue.  The debate would be recorded on video and a copy given to each party in the debate.


Simply email us to get the ball rolling.   
Simply [[Contact information|email us]] if you are prepared to meet this challenge.   


But we stress that any interaction must be done in a Biblical manner - with "gentleness and respect".
But we stress that any interaction must be done in a Biblical manner - with "gentleness and respect".