View source for The Vision of the Pentecostal Kitten

{{Top of Page}}
William Branham relates a vision he had of a "Pentecostal kitten'.  When petted the animal against the fur, it would spit and become extremely upset:

:''As long as you rake his fur this way, all right; but now if you want to see what he’s made out of, rake his fur backwards. See? So when I raked his fur back, them eyes stuck out, green, and he was a monster standing there spitting at me as hard as he could. See, just rake his fur back a little bit.''<ref>William Branham, 60-1209 - The Sardisean Church Age, para. 63</ref>

Is this vision a better description today of message followers (and ministers in particular), than it is of Pentecostals?  That has certainly been my experience.  And it is relatively easy to test.

Find a Pentecostal pastor and ask him a question that goes to the center of his beliefs, such as - "I don't believe that speaking in tongues is the initial evidence of the Holy Spirit.  Why do you think it is?"  And then find a message pastor and ask him a question similar to the following - "Why do you follow William Branham if the municipal bridge vision failed?"  

Compare the response and let us know what you find out.

If you talk to anyone who has questioned the message or worse, left the message, they will tell you stories of the terrible reaction they have received from message followers.  Are the Pentecostals the monster or is it those in the message?