11,141
edits
Red Herring Arguments: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
The construction with the accusative, however, describes a hearing which includes mental apprehension of the message spoken. From this it becomes evident that the two passages are not contradictory. | The construction with the accusative, however, describes a hearing which includes mental apprehension of the message spoken. From this it becomes evident that the two passages are not contradictory. | ||
Acts 22:9 does not deny that the associates of Paul heard certain sounds; it simply declares that they did not hear in such a way as to understand what was being said. Our English idiom in this case simply is not so expressive as the Greek | Acts 22:9 does not deny that the associates of Paul heard certain sounds; it simply declares that they did not hear in such a way as to understand what was being said. Our English idiom in this case simply is not so expressive as the Greek. | ||
==Differences in Paul's Conversion Experiences== | ==Differences in Paul's Conversion Experiences== | ||
| Line 81: | Line 79: | ||
=References= | =References= | ||
Josh McDowell and Don Douglas Stewart, Answers to Tough Questions (Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers, 1993) | |||