11,153
edits
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
The Johannine Comma is also absent from the manuscripts of the Latin Vulgate before 750AD and is absent from all Coptic, Ethiopian, Arabic, and Slavic translations up to 1500AD. | The Johannine Comma is also absent from the manuscripts of the Latin Vulgate before 750AD and is absent from all Coptic, Ethiopian, Arabic, and Slavic translations up to 1500AD. | ||
The ''Sacred Congregation of the Inquisition'' issued a decretal on 13 January 1897, forbidding anyone to question the authenticity of the Johannine Comma: its genuineness could neither be denied nor doubted. Pope Leo XIII confirmed this judgment two days later. On 2 June 1927, however, a new official declaration by the ''Holy Office'', as the successor institution to the ''Sacred Congregation of the Inquisition'', made Roman Catholic exegetes again free to discuss the question of the Johannine Comma. From that time it has been generally recognized in Roman Catholic scholarship also that the Johannine Comma is neither original nor authentic.<ref>Georg Strecker and Harold W. Attridge, The Johannine Letters: A Commentary on 1, 2, and 3 John, Hermeneia—a Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1996), 188–189.</ref> | '''The ''Sacred Congregation of the Inquisition''''' issued a decretal on 13 January 1897, '''forbidding anyone to question the authenticity of the Johannine Comma: its genuineness could neither be denied nor doubted.''' Pope Leo XIII confirmed this judgment two days later. On 2 June 1927, however, a new official declaration by the ''Holy Office'', as the successor institution to the ''Sacred Congregation of the Inquisition'', made Roman Catholic exegetes again free to discuss the question of the Johannine Comma. From that time it has been generally recognized in Roman Catholic scholarship also that the Johannine Comma is neither original nor authentic.<ref>Georg Strecker and Harold W. Attridge, The Johannine Letters: A Commentary on 1, 2, and 3 John, Hermeneia—a Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1996), 188–189.</ref> | ||
=How it got into the King James Version= | =How it got into the King James Version= |