11,153
edits
Philippians 2:7: Difference between revisions
→How William Branham interpreted it
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:''...Notice, all the Glory that is in God is in the Word. All the blessings that’s in God is in the Word. It’s hid, to the unbeliever, by traditions. See what I mean? But It’s all in Christ. '''All that God was, He emptied Himself, “kenos,” and came into Christ;''' and we, into Christ, are behind the veil.<ref>William Branham, 64-0614M - The Unveiling Of God, para. 77-78, 238</ref> | :''...Notice, all the Glory that is in God is in the Word. All the blessings that’s in God is in the Word. It’s hid, to the unbeliever, by traditions. See what I mean? But It’s all in Christ. '''All that God was, He emptied Himself, “kenos,” and came into Christ;''' and we, into Christ, are behind the veil.<ref>William Branham, 64-0614M - The Unveiling Of God, para. 77-78, 238</ref> | ||
William Branham does not understand that Christ emptied himself to become a man. He changes the meaning of "emptied himself" to "poured into" and then says that this means that God poured himself into Christ, which is not what the passage says. Christ emptied himself! The passage does not state that the Father emptied himself into the Son. This is not what the passage says. | William Branham does not understand that Christ emptied himself to become a man. '''He changes the meaning of "emptied himself" to "poured into"''' and then says that this means that God poured himself into Christ, which is not what the passage says. Christ emptied himself! The passage does not state that the Father emptied himself into the Son. This is not what the passage says. | ||
William Branham further misinterprets this a few weeks later: | William Branham further misinterprets this a few weeks later: | ||