11,153
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Top of Page}} | {{Top of Page}} | ||
{{Reason and the Message}} | {{Reason and the Message}} | ||
= How did Jesus deal with doubt?= | |||
There was a person in the Bible that thought that Jesus was the messiah but later on he began to have some doubt. | |||
How did Jesus deal with this man's doubt? | |||
Here is the story about John the Baptist from Luke 7:18- 23: | |||
:''John’s disciples told him about all these things. Calling two of them, 19 he sent them to the Lord to ask, “Are you the one who is to come, or should we expect someone else?” When the men came to Jesus, they said, “John the Baptist sent us to you to ask, ‘Are you the one who is to come, or should we expect someone else?’ ” At that very time Jesus cured many who had diseases, sicknesses and evil spirits, and gave sight to many who were blind. So he replied to the messengers, “Go back and report to John what you have seen and heard: The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is proclaimed to the poor. Blessed is anyone who does not stumble on account of me.” <ref>The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), Lk 7:18–23.</ref> | |||
Jesus did not say, "How could you doubt me, John?" He did not condemn John for doubting. What he did was point to the evidence and to tell John's followers to go back to him and tell John the Baptist what they saw. | |||
Jesus did not condemn doubt and he simply pointed to the evidence. | |||
=William Branham and Doubt= | =William Branham and Doubt= | ||
William Branham admitted that we had a right to doubt him. This is the correct approach. If Paul commended the Bereans in Acts 17:11 for not simply accepting his word but going to the Bible to prove it, why wouldn't we take the same approach to William Branham? | William Branham admitted that we had a right to doubt him. This is the correct approach. If Paul commended the Bereans in Acts 17:11 for not simply accepting his word but going to the Bible to prove it, why wouldn't we take the same approach to William Branham? |