Jump to content

Template:Bernard Oneness: Difference between revisions

From BelieveTheSign
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
David Bernard's book, ''The Oneness of God'', is, in the kindest possible reading, a theologically motivated exercise in confirmation bias dressed up in the costume of systematic theology. He sets out not to discover what the Bible teaches about God but to defend a conclusion already reached. The result is a book riddled with logical fallacies, selective use of evidence, category errors, and interpretive sleight of hand. What follows is a chapter-by-chapter and argument-by-argument analysis. References are drawn from Boyd's Oneness Pentecostals and the Trinity, Grudem's Systematic Theology, and Geisler's Come Let Us Reason Together.
This is our series of articles analyzing David Bernard's book, ''The Oneness of God''. You are on the page that is in bold. Click on the links to go to a particular chapter:
 
You are on the page that is in bold. Click on the links to go to a particular chapter:
   
   
*[[A critical response to Bernard's The Oneness of God|Inroduction and Overview]]
*[[A critical response to Bernard's The Oneness of God|Inroduction and Overview]]

Latest revision as of 22:53, 2 June 2026