11,143
edits
Question 4 (BM2) - The Trinity and other issues: Difference between revisions
Question 4 (BM2) - The Trinity and other issues (view source)
Revision as of 19:00, 3 March 2019
, 5 years ago→Progressive Revelation
| Line 392: | Line 392: | ||
You use his statements and then put your spin on them and I read the same statements and understand exactly what he meant. Not one place can you show us a teaching...where he taught the Denominational TRINITARIAN version of the Godhead....with 3 separate persons making one god. | You use his statements and then put your spin on them and I read the same statements and understand exactly what he meant. Not one place can you show us a teaching...where he taught the Denominational TRINITARIAN version of the Godhead....with 3 separate persons making one god. | ||
If I said....depending on the audience being dealt with..... that GOD the Father was the 1st...2nd and 3rd Person of the Godhead...it would be totally correct....if the person listening knew what I meant by the statement. To another filled with the spirit of criticism....it would be confusion. It's just a matter of placing the attributes of the one person GOD...... in the correct manifestation and/or timeframe. Personally.....I think you are somewhat void concerning the Revelation of Godhead.... as taught all the way through by Brother Branham. Otherwise you wouldn't use your spin on his wording...trying to make him say something that he didn't believe. | |||
Can you please show us where what we showed you wasn’t in what Branham taught? He taught those things, right?? Unbelievable. | Can you please show us where what we showed you wasn’t in what Branham taught? He taught those things, right?? Unbelievable. | ||