Question 34 (ABM) - The Cloud over Flagstaff: Difference between revisions

Question 34 (ABM) - The Cloud over Flagstaff (view source)

Revision as of 03:28, 15 February 2019

11 bytes added , 5 years ago

→‎ABM - There is some validity to your claims

Admin

Bots, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, nuke, Suppressors, Administrators

11,141

edits

@@ Line 422: / Line 422: @@
 ==ABM - There is some validity to your claims==
-A basic element in your conclusions in all this is accurate. Bro. Branham exaggerated, he made some things up. Those exaggerations not related to doctrine or biblical interpretation can be "excused" as a personal failing of a man. There is sound biblical precedence for that. The result though is that we have to be careful, and make sure we validate things by the bible and not repeat everything as fact unless we know it is true. This goes back to the basic problem with some people in the movement, they are unable to separate fact from fiction, on this level, or on the doctrinal level. And that is the kind of a church you came out of. We are not all that way, and we have been honest about these things since the beginning.
+'''ABM:''' A basic element in your conclusions in all this is accurate. Bro. Branham exaggerated, he made some things up. Those exaggerations not related to doctrine or biblical interpretation can be "excused" as a personal failing of a man. There is sound biblical precedence for that. The result though is that we have to be careful, and make sure we validate things by the bible and not repeat everything as fact unless we know it is true. This goes back to the basic problem with some people in the movement, they are unable to separate fact from fiction, on this level, or on the doctrinal level. And that is the kind of a church you came out of. We are not all that way, and we have been honest about these things since the beginning.
 ===BTS - WHY DID WILLIAM BRANHAM NOT MAKE A SINGLE REFERENCE TO THE CLOUD PRIOR TO JUNE 1962?===